Hospital Accountability for Medical Actions: A Justice-Oriented Approach Based on the Doctrine of Vicarious Liability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/hl2025914Keywords:
Hospital Accountability, Medical Action, Vicarious Liability, JusticeAbstract
Health is a human right that must be guaranteed by the state, as stipulated in the 1945 Constitution and Law No. 17 of 2023. Hospitals play a crucial role as providers of medical services and are responsible for patient safety. However, the increasing number of alleged medical malpractice cases demonstrates a gap between legal norms and practice, particularly regarding applying the vicarious liability doctrine in determining hospital liability for medical personnel's negligence. This study employed a normative juridical method with a statute and a conceptual approach. Secondary data in laws and regulations, literature, and journals were analyzed descriptively and analytically to examine legal norms, liability doctrine, and distributive and corrective justice principles. The results show that although Article 193 of Law No. 17 of 2023 has affirmed hospital liability, its practice still faces legal ambiguity, particularly regarding the status of non-employee physicians. This condition, which we refer to as 'jurisprudential inconsistencies '- a situation where legal decisions or practices are contradictory or unclear-creates a heavy burden of proof for patients and legal uncertainty. This study concludes that a loyalty-based, tiered accountability model is needed, where hospitals are fully responsible for monoloyal physicians, while multiloyal practices implement shared responsibility. This model is expected to strengthen patient protection, increase legal certainty, and encourage equitable hospital governance.
References
1. Ringkuangan R, Kolibu F, Mandagi C. Hubungan Antara Bauran Pemasaran dengan Loyalitas Pasien Poliklinik Eksekutif Sentra Medika Hospital Minahasa Utara. J Kesehat Masy Univ Sam Ratulangi. 2025;14(1):23–31. https://doi.org/10.35790/kesmas.v14i1
2. Lisangan Y, Renggong R, Madiong B. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Malpraktik Medik Di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Anutapura Palu. Indones J Leg Law. 2024;6(2):349–54. https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v6i2.4481
3. Yulianto, Cahyono, Eko Agus, Agustuningsih I. Transfer Iptek Pentingnya Informed Consent Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Tenaga Kesehatan. J Masy Mandiri dan Berdaya. 2025;IV:167–86. https://doi.org/10.56586/mbm.v4i2.485
4. Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1999. 6 p.
5. Azyabi A, Karwowski W, Davahli MR. Assessing patient safety culture in hospital settings. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(5):1–36. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052466
6. Noor A. Socio-Legal Research: Integration of Normative and Empirical Juridical Research in Legal Research. J Ilm Dunia Huk. 2023;7(2):61–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.56444/jidh.v7i2.3154
7. Widjaja G. Ensuring Patient Rights And Safety : Legal Protection In The 2023 Health Law For Safe And Quality Medical Services. Int J Humanit Soc Sci Bus. 2025;4(3):675–86. https://injoqast.net/index.php/JOSSS/article/view/423
8. Meutia CY, Sidi R, Maulana AR. Legal Protection of the Right to Health Service Guarantee for Hospital Patients. Pamali Pattimura Magister Law Rev. 2025;5(2):220–9.https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v5i2.3027
9. Fanda RB, Probandari A, Yuniar Y, Hendarwan H, Trisnantoro L, Jongeneel N, et al. The availability of essential medicines in primary health centres in Indonesia: achievements and challenges across the archipelago. Lancet Reg Heal - Southeast Asia [Internet]. 2024;22:100345. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100345
10. Setiawati S, Daulat PAS. Hospital Liability as a Corporation in Medical Malpractice. In: International Conference On Law, Economics, and Health [Internet]. Atlantis Press SARL; 2023. p. 82–91. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-024-4_11
11. Muhtarom M. Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian: Suatu Landasan Dalam Pembuatan Kontrak. Suhuf. 2014;26(1).
12. Saipudin L. The Concept of Corporate Criminal Liability in the Indonesian Criminal Law System. J IUS Kaji Huk dan Keadilan. 2025;13(2):45–53. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v13i2.1817
13. Rahmawan H, Sabri F, Mannas YA. Regulating Legal Relationships of Doctors and Hospitals to One Party with Patients to Other Parties in the Indonesian Civil Law System. Int J Multicult Multireligious Underst. 2019;6(4):255. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i4.990
14. Budiman A, Rizka R, Absori A. Juridical Analysis of Hospital Liability for Actions of Doctors Performing Medical Malpractice. Soepra. 2023;9(1):95–101. https://doi.org/10.24167/sjhk.v9i1.10061
15. Budi M, Putra US. Doctor’S Liability for a Patient’S Lawsuit in Health Services At Hospital. Int J Business, Econ Law. 2019;20(5):274–85. https://www.ijbel.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/IJBEL20_505.pdf
16. Prasetyo H, Waluyo B, Subakdi S, Roring EB, Salles S. Reconstruction of Criminal Design Based on Strict Liability Theory for Hospitals in Cases of Medical Malpractice Against Patients. J Suara Huk. 2024;6(2):331–55. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v6n2.p331-355.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eko Krisnarto, Edy Lisdiyono, Anggraeni Endah Kusumaningrum, Afif Noor (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
