Intersection between health and entrepreneurship in the context of sustainable development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/hl202289Keywords:
health, entrepreneurship, sustainable development, innovation, Sustainable Development GoalAbstract
The article analyzes the intersection between health and entrepreneurship in the context of sustainable development, highlighting how this relationship contributes to the fulfillment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through innovation and the generation of positive impacts. Using a critical and thematic approach, scientific publications were evaluated between 2017 and 2022, identifying key trends such as increased academic output, international collaboration, and major areas of interdisciplinary research. The results show that health entrepreneurship transcends economic profitability, focusing on sustainable solutions that promote equity in access to services, resource optimization and community integration. The main lines of research include the implementation of disruptive technologies in health, the promotion of sustainable entrepreneurship ecosystems and the development of inclusive business models. Although the study has limitations, such as the exclusion of specific cultural perspectives and the absence of a more detailed analysis of case studies, it establishes a solid foundation for future research. It suggests exploring local experiences, the impact of public policies and the potential of emerging technologies to strengthen this relationship. This article provides a framework for understanding and enhancing the dynamics between health, entrepreneurship and sustainability.
References
1. Shepherd DA, Patzelt H. Researching the Inter-Relationship of Health and Entrepreneurship. En: Trailblazing in Entrepreneurship. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 209–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48701-4_7
2. Wiklund J, Nikolaev B, Shir N, Foo MD, Bradley S. Entrepreneurship and well-being: Past, present, and future. Journal of Business Venturing. 2019;34(4):579–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.01.002
3. Camacho Vargas CA, Cuyabazo Burbano LY, Sánchez Castillo V. Diagnosis of the peasant family farming system and its contribution to the food security of a peasant family in the San Antonio de Atenas village, Florencia, Caquetá. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias. 2022;1:41. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf202241
4. Dhahri S, Omri A. Entrepreneurship contribution to the three pillars of sustainable development: What does the evidence really say? World Development. 2018;106:64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.008
5. Lehoux P, Pacifico Silva H, Pozelli Sabio R, Roncarolo F. The Unexplored Contribution of Responsible Innovation in Health to Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability. 2018;10(11):4015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114015
6. Ricardo Jiménez LS. Dimensiones de emprendimiento: Relación educativa. El caso del programa cumbre. Región Científica. 2022;1(1):202210. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202210
7. Khandelwal R, Kolte A, Rossi M. A study on entrepreneurial opportunities in digital health-care post-Covid-19 from the perspective of developing countries. Foresight. 2022;24(3/4):527–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-02-2021-0043
8. Leite H, Lindsay C, Kumar M. COVID-19 outbreak: implications on healthcare operations. The TQM Journal. 2020;33(1):247–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-05-2020-0111
9. Vermicelli S, Cricelli L, Grimaldi M. How can crowdsourcing help tackle the COVID‐19 pandemic? An explorative overview of innovative collaborative practices. R&D Management. 2021;51(2):183–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12443
10. Abdel-Basset M, Chang V, Nabeeh NA. An intelligent framework using disruptive technologies for COVID-19 analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021;163:120431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120431
11. Ben Youssef A, Boubaker S, Omri A. Entrepreneurship and sustainability: The need for innovative and institutional solutions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2018;129:232–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.003
12. Vallaster C, Kraus S, Kailer N, Baldwin B. Responsible entrepreneurship: outlining the contingencies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 2019;25(3):538–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2018-0206
13. Rosca E, Agarwal N, Brem A. Women entrepreneurs as agents of change: A comparative analysis of social entrepreneurship processes in emerging markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020;157:120067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120067
14. Sutter C, Bruton GD, Chen J. Entrepreneurship as a solution to extreme poverty: A review and future research directions. Journal of Business Venturing. 2019;34(1):197–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.06.003
15. Khalid S, Dixon S, Vijayasingham L. The gender responsiveness of social entrepreneurship in health – A review of initiatives by Ashoka fellows. Social Science & Medicine. 2022;293:114665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114665
16. Orozco Castillo EA. Experiencias en torno al emprendimiento femenino. Región Científica. 2022;1(1):20225. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc20225
17. De Los Rios IC, Charnley FJS. Skills and capabilities for a sustainable and circular economy: The changing role of design. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;160:109–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.130
18. Manea DI, Istudor N, Dinu V, Paraschiv DM. CIRCULAR ECONOMY AND INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENEURSHIP, PREREQUISITES FOR SOCIAL PROGRESS. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 2021;22(5):1342–59. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2021.15547
19. Ramirez-Rubio O, Daher C, Fanjul G, Gascon M, Mueller N, Pajín L, et al. Urban health: an example of a “health in all policies” approach in the context of SDGs implementation. Globalization and Health. 2019;15(1):87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0529-z
20. Fonseca LM, Domingues JP, Dima AM. Mapping the Sustainable Development Goals Relationships. Sustainability. 2020;12(8):3359. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083359
21. Belén Herrero M, Loza J, Belardo MB. Collective health and regional integration in Latin America: An opportunity for building a new international health agenda. Global Public Health. 2019;14(6–7):835–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2019.1572207
22. Johnson MP, Schaltegger S. Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development: A Review and Multilevel Causal Mechanism Framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2020;44(6):1141–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719885368
23. Gómez Miranda OM. La franquicia: de la inversión al emprendimiento. Región Científica. 2022;1(1):20229. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc20229
24. Terán-Yépez E, Marín-Carrillo GM, Casado-Belmonte MDP, Capobianco-Uriarte MDLM. Sustainable entrepreneurship: Review of its evolution and new trends. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;252:119742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119742
25. Negash S, Musa P, Vogel D, Sahay S. Healthcare information technology for development: improvements in people’s lives through innovations in the uses of technologies. Information Technology for Development. 2018;24(2):189–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2018.1422477
26. Kelly CJ, Young AJ. Promoting innovation in healthcare. Future Healthcare Journal. 2017;4(2):121–5. https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.4-2-121
27. Flessa S, Huebner C. Innovations in Health Care—A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(19):10026. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910026
28. Borges Machín AY, González Bravo YL. Educación comunitaria para un envejecimiento activo: experiencia en construcción desde el autodesarrollo. Región Científica. 2022;1(1):202213. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202213
29. Rodríguez Torres E, Gómez Cano CA, Sánchez Castillo V. Management information systems and their impact on business decision making. Data and Metadata. 2022;1. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm202221
30. Liang J, Yin Z, Yang J, Li Y, Xu M, Li J, et al. Bibliometrics and visualization analysis of research in the field of sustainable development of the blue economy (2006–2021). Frontiers in Marine Science. 2022;9:936612. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.936612
31. Palozzi G, Schettini I, Chirico A. Enhancing the Sustainable Goal of Access to Healthcare: Findings from a Literature Review on Telemedicine Employment in Rural Areas. Sustainability. 2020;12(8):3318. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083318
32. Vaquiro Caycedo C, Sánchez-Castillo V. Mechanisms of crop adaptation to climate change in the Troncales corregimiento of San Vicente del Caguán. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias. 2022;1:6. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf202238
33. Lehoux P, Roncarolo F, Silva HP, Boivin A, Denis JL, Hébert R. What Health System Challenges Should Responsible Innovation in Health Address? Insights From an International Scoping Review. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2018;8(2):63–75. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.110
34. Patarroyo Rivera LJ, Araque Cerón JA, Gómez Cano CA. Economic impact of the PAEF on the ferry sector companies in Florenica Caqueta. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias. 2022;1:8. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf202240
35. Kieny MP, Bekedam H, Dovlo D, Fitzgerald J, Habicht J, Harrison G, et al. Strengthening health systems for universal health coverage and sustainable development. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2017;95(7):537–9. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.187476
36. Rincón González LA, Quiroz Valderrama JF, Gómez-Cano CA. Characterization of the economic effects generated by COVID-19 to the providers of the special transport service (Tourism) of Caquetá. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias. 2022;1:39. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf202239
37. Gómez Cano CA, Sánchez Castillo V, Ballen Losada Y, Bermudez Monje MA. Analysis of the risks associated with the provision of services in respiratory diseases ward during the COVID 19 pandemic at the Hospital Maria Inmaculada. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología. 2022;2:123. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2022123
38. Price L. Interdisciplinarity, health and well-being. Journal of Critical Realism. 2021;20(5):449–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2021.1999721
39. Pérez Gamboa AJ, Gómez Cano CA, Sánchez Castillo V. Decision making in university contexts based on knowledge management systems. Data and Metadata. 2022;1:92. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm202292
40. Engwall L. Structural Conditions for Interdisciplinarity. European Review. 2018;26(S2):S30–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S106279871800025X
41. Żelazna A, Bojar M, Bojar E. Corporate Social Responsibility towards the Environment in Lublin Region, Poland: A Comparative Study of 2009 and 2019. Sustainability. 2020;12(11):4463. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114463
42. Prashar A. Towards sustainable development in industrial small and Medium-sized Enterprises: An energy sustainability approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;235:977–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.045
43. Downing AS, Wong GY, Dyer M, Aguiar AP, Selomane O, Jiménez Aceituno A. When the whole is less than the sum of all parts – Tracking global-level impacts of national sustainability initiatives. Global Environmental Change. 2021;69:102306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102306
44. Ratten V. Coronavirus (covid-19) and entrepreneurship: changing life and work landscape. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship. 2020;32(5):503–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1790167
45. Thukral E. COVID-19: Small and medium enterprises challenges and responses with creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Strategic Change. 2021;30(2):153–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2399
46. Mogrovejo Andrade JM. Estrategias resilientes y mecanismos de las organizaciones para mitigar los efectos ocasionados por la pandemia a nivel internacional. Región Científica. 2022;1(1):202211. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202211
47. Gopalakrishnan S, Kovoor-Misra S. Understanding the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic through the lens of innovation. BRQ Business Research Quarterly. 2021;24(3):224–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444211013357
48. Barchielli C, Marullo C, Bonciani M, Vainieri M. Nurses and the acceptance of innovations in technology-intensive contexts: the need for tailored management strategies. BMC Health Services Research. 2021;21(1):639. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06628-5
49. Sánchez Cardozo MB, Gómez Cano CA. Perception of the merchants upon the implementation of an electronic payroll as a support document for the companies costs and deductions at Florencia- Caquetá. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias. 2022;1:2. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf202234
50. Morton S, Pencheon D, Squires N. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and their implementation. British Medical Bulletin. 2017;1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldx031
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Carlos Alberto Gómez Cano , Yanetsy García Acevedo , Alfredo Javier Pérez Gamboa (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
