Impact of Communication on Healthy Lifestyle and Healthcare Sector

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/hl2025711

Keywords:

communication, communication in medicine, communication slills, patient, doctor-patient communication, levels of communication, variants of communication, healthcare sector, communication tactics

Abstract

Introduction: the article is devoted to the study of the influence of communication in healthcare on the promotion of a healthy lifestyle, prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation of patients based on data from scientific research in communication psychology, biomedical ethics, and medical communication.
Methods: the following methods were used in the study: analysis and synthesis methods, a comparative method, situation modeling and forecasting method.
Results: The authors describe the specifics of communicative interaction between doctor and patient and its main trends at different stages of medical care. The article formulates the main communicative tactics of doctor-patient dialogue, the use of which will contribute to improving the results of treatment and disease prevention. It is shown that the treatment process directly depends on the effectiveness of the doctor-patient communication model, since the patient's trust in the doctor is the basis of the recovery process. The features of communication between the doctor and the patient are described, and the influence of ethical principles and knowledge of the psychological characteristics of this type of professional interaction on the effectiveness of such interaction is shown. The authors emphasize that communication between doctor and patient takes place on two independent and mandatory levels: linguistic and extralinguistic. The “doctor-patient” communication model is not constant and changes depending on the sphere and purpose of such communication: prevention, treatment, or rehabilitation. This is the basis for choosing tactics, means, forms, and strategies of communication.
Conclusions: The most optimal model of interaction between a doctor and a patient is currently considered to be the “partnership model,” which involves the patient in making joint medical decisions, thereby reducing patient anxiety. Involving the patient in dialogue in this model allows the responsibility for the treatment process to be shared between the parties involved. Prospects for further research include improving communication tactics in healthcare by all healthcare providers (doctors, nurses, and other healthcare professionals), studying ethical issues in healthcare communication, and developing new communication tactics to improve the effectiveness of healthcare delivery and public health.

References

1. Liu Q, Zheng Z, Zheng J, et al. Health communication through news media during the early stage of the COVID-19 outbreak in China: a digital topic modeling approach. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(4):e19118. https://doi.org/10.2196/19118

2. Mykhalchuk N, Zlyvkov V, Lukomska S, Nabochuk A, Khrystych N. Psycholinguistic Paradigm of the Medical Staff – Patients Communicative Interaction in the Conditions of COVID-19 in Ukraine and Scotland. Psycholinguistics 2022;31(1):92–117. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2022-31-1-92-117

3. White P, Bishop FL, Prescott P, Scott C, Little P, Lewith G. Practice, practitioner, or placebo? A multifactorial, mixed-methods randomized controlled trial of acupuncture. Pain 2012;153:455–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.11.007

4. Liu W, Manias E, Gerdtz M. Medication communication during ward rounds on medical wards: Power relations and spatial practices. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 2012;17(2):113–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459312447257

5. Sheehan J, Laver K, Bhopti A, Rahja M, Usherwood T, Clemson L, Lannin NA. Methods and Effectiveness of Communication Between Hospital Allied Health and Primary Care Practitioners: A Systematic Narrative Review. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 2012;14:493–511. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S295549

6. Ratna H. The importance of effective communication in healthcare practice. Harvard Public Health Review 2019;23. https://doi.org/10.54111/0001/W4

7. Kwame A, Petrucka PM. A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: barriers, facilitators, and the way forward. BMC Nurs 2012;20:158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2

8. Bello P. Effective communication in nursing practice: A literature review. Bachelor’s Thesis Degree Programme in Nursing. Arcada. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 12 June 2025]. Available in: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/84798372.pdf (date of access: 21.10.2024).

9. Tindle K, David A, Carlisle S, et al. Relationship of the built environment on nursing communication patterns in the emergency department: A task performance and analysis time study. Journal of Emergency Nursing 2020;46(4):440–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2020.04.005

10. Howick J, Moscrop A, Mebius A, et al. Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2018;111(7):240–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076818769477

11. Tymkiv IS, Tymkiv IV, Blyzniuk MV, Vengrovych OZ, Romash NI, Gavrysh IT. Doctor and patient: psychological types of doctors. Archive of Clinical Medicine [Internet]. 2012 [cited 12 June 2025];2(18):120. Available in: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/akm_2012_2_40

12. Riera R, de Oliveira Cruz Latorraca C, Padovez RC, M. et al. Strategies for communicating scientific evidence on healthcare to managers and the population: a scoping review. Health Research Policy and Systems 2023;21:71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-01017-2

13. Kuzmina M, Kuzmin V, Mosaiev, Yu., Karpenko N, Tarasenko K. Forecasting Career-And Competence Indicators of a Social Worker in the Context of Digital Transformations of the Society. SHS Web of Conferences 2021;100:04005. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110004005

14. Humenna IR. Preparation of future doctors for professional communication on the basis of interdisciplinary integration. Dissertation for the degree of candidate of pedagogical sciences. Ternopil National Pedagogical University, 2016.

15. Chen YF, Hemming K, Chilton PJ, Gupta KK, Altman DG, Lilford RJ. Scientific hypotheses can be tested by comparing the effects of one treatment over many diseases in a systematic review. Journal Clin Epidemiol 2014;67:1309–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.007

16. Yashadhana A, Fields T, Blitner G, Stanley R, Zwi AB. Trust, culture and communication: determinants of eye health and care among Indigenous people with diabetes in Australia. BMJ Global Health 2020;5(1):e001999. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001999

17. Butow P, Hoque E. Using artificial intelligence to analyse and teach communication in healthcare. The Breast 2020;50:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.01.008

18. Karnieli-Miller O. Reflective practice in the teaching of communication skills. Patient Education and Counseling 2020;103(10):2166–2172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.021

19. Doty MM, Tikkanen R, Shah A, Schneider EC. Primary care physicians’ role in coordinating medical and health-related social needs in eleven countries. Health Affairs 2020;39:115–123. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01088

20. Ortega P, Prada J. Words matter: Translanguaging in medical communication skills training. Perspectives on Medical Education 2020;9:251–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-020-00595-Z

21. Miller KK, Lin S, Neville M. From Hospital to Home to Participation: A Position Paper on Transition Planning Poststroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2019;100:1162–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.10.017

22. Sato A, Honda K, Ono K, Kanda R, Hayashi TI, Takeda Y, Takebayashi Y, Kobayashi T, Murakami M. Reviews on common objectives and evaluation indicators for risk communication activities from 2011 to 2017. PeerJ – Life Environment 2020;8:e9730. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9730

23. Shaarani I, El-Kantar A, Hamzeh N, et al. Interprofessional communication of physicians using WhatsApp: physicians’ perspective. Telemedicine and e-Health 2020;26(10):1257–1264. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0216

24. Page M, Crampton P, Viney R, Rich A, Griffin A. Teaching medical professionalism: a qualitative exploration of persuasive communication as an educational strategy. BMC Medical Education 2020;20(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1993-0

25. Koliadenko NV, Zhyvago KS, Bursa AI. Provision of medical-psychological and psychiatric care to patients with post-covid syndrome in telemedicine conditions. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science 2022;21(4):719–730. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v21i4.60256

26. Harvard Medical School (2015). The Eight Principles of Patient Centered Care. OneView, November 18. Internet]. 2015 [cited 12 June 2025]. Available in: https://www.oneviewhealthcare.com/the-eight-principles-of-patient-centered-care/.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-18

How to Cite

1.
Burachyk A, Fomina I, Grushko V, Shostak Y, Hloba T. Impact of Communication on Healthy Lifestyle and Healthcare Sector. Health Leadership and Quality of Life [Internet]. 2025 Jul. 18 [cited 2025 Sep. 16];4:711. Available from: https://hl.ageditor.ar/index.php/hl/article/view/711