Exploring the limits: reproductive rights and biotechnology in the modern era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/hl2024.530Keywords:
Reproductive rights, Biotechnology, Ethics, Autonomy, Assisted human reproduction, Human reproductionAbstract
This paper explores the intersection between reproductive rights and biotechnology in the context of the modern era. Objective: To determine the bioethical dilemmas associated with reproductive rights in biotechnology-driven procedures Methodology: This is a literature review using a PRISMA diagram in which 12 articles were analyzed. Results: Significant benefits were identified in the use of assisted human reproduction techniques (AHR), especially in couples with sterility or infertility problems. In addition, the need to establish a solid ethical and legal framework to protect the rights and dignity of all persons involved in reproductive biotechnological processes was identified. Conclusion: While there are potential benefits to expanded access to assisted reproductive technologies and genetic manipulation, there are also significant ethical and social concerns that require careful and deliberate attention
References
Bladilo A, De la Torre N, Herrera M. Las técnicas de reproducción humana asistida desde los derechos humanos como perspectiva obligada de análisis. Rev IUS [Internet]. 2017;11(39). Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.35487/rius.v11i39.2017.293
Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU) Declaración universal de los derechos humanos. [citado el 3 de marzo de 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.ohchr.org/es/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
Lecubarri Odriozola, Mario. "Derechos reproductivos, gestación subrogada y ectogénesis: el futuro de la reproducción humana." (2023).
Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU). Comité de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales, "The right to sexual and reproductive health (article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights)", Colectivo Derecho de Familia. [Consulta: 16 de septiembre, 2016]. Disponible en Disponible en http://www.colectivoderechofamilia.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/04/Observaci%C3%B3n-N-22-DESC_Derechos-sexuales-y-Reproductivos-02-05-2016.pdf
San José, Daniel García, Fernando Llano Alonso, and César Villegas Delgado. "Medicina, biotecnología y derecho." IUS ET SCIENTIA 8.2 (2022): 5-8.
Wessel JA, Hunt S, van Wely M, Mol F, Wang R. Alternatives to in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2023;120(3):483–93. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.01.011
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;74(9):790–9.
Rodríguez Tovar MV, Camarillo Govea LA. Gestación subrogada: alcances y límites en la teoría kantiana. Intersticios Soc [Internet]. 2021;(22). Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.55555/is.22.317
Brandão P, Garrido N. Commercial surrogacy: An overview. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet [Internet]. 2022;44(12):1141–58. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759774
De Haro V. El deber de beneficencia en Kant y Fichte. Ideas [Internet]. 2020;69(174):123–41. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v69n174.67642
Klock SC, Lindheim SR. Gestational surrogacy: medical, psychosocial, and legal considerations. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2020;113(5):889–91. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.03.016
Saad Pestana SD. neuroética de la gestación subrogada. Med Etica [Internet]. 2021;32(3):665–702. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.36105/mye.2021v32n3.02
Torres Quiroga MÁ. El posthumanismo reproductivo a la vuelta de la esquina (explotación reproductiva 3.0). Rev Bioet Derecho [Internet]. 2022;141–61. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1344/rbd2022.56.40545
Correa da Silva W. A bibliometric analysis of research on surrogacy: Current trends and gaps between international law and new technology. Rev Chil Derecho Tecnol [Internet]. 2021;10(2):333. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.5354/0719-2584.2021.63742
Yang L, Liang F, Zhu R, Wang Q, Yao L, Zhang X. Efficacy of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in women with non-male factor infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand [Internet]. 2024;103(1):30–41. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14698
Bhattacharya S, Hamilton MPR, Shaaban M, Khalaf Y, Seddler M, Ghobara T, et al. Conventional in-vitro fertilisation versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of non-male-factor infertility: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet [Internet]. 2001;357(9274):2075–9. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)05179-5
Haas J, Miller TE, Nahum R, Aizer A, Kirshenbaum M, Zilberberg E, et al. The role of ICSI vs. conventional IVF for patients with advanced maternal age-a randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet [Internet]. 2021;38(1):95–100. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01990-5
Dang VQ, Vuong LN, Luu TM, Pham TD, Ho TM, Ha AN, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in-vitro fertilisation in couples with infertility in whom the male partner has normal total sperm count and motility: an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet [Internet]. 2021;397(10284):1554–63. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00535-3
Mora P, Molina E, El derecho a la salud y la fertilización in vitro [citado el 3 de marzo de 2024]. Disponible en: https://corteidh.or.cr/tablas/r34628.pdf
Asamblea Mundial de la Salud, 50. (1997). Clonación y reproducción humana: la clonación, la tecnología biomédica y el papel de la OMS en el establecimiento de normas: informe del Director General. Organización Mundial de la Salud. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/203999
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (UNESCO) (2003), Declaración Internacional sobre los datos genéticos Humanos: Informe del Director General: Declaración Internacional sobre los Datos Genéticos Humanos | UNESCO
Reschini M, Buoli M, Facchin F, Limena A, Dallagiovanna C, Bollati V, et al. Women’s quality of sleep and in vitro fertilization success. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2022;12(1). Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22534-0.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Danny Stuart Bohórquez Rivera, Stephanie Alejandra Almagro Córdova , Denisse Isabel Suaste Pazmiño (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
