Accuracy of full arch models achieved from different 3D printers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/hl2024.448Keywords:
accuracy, 3D printing, full archesAbstract
This work titled "Accuracy of full arch models achieved from different 3D printers" addresses significant advancements in the field of dentistry thanks to CAD-CAM technology and 3D printing, which have transformed precision and efficiency in dental treatments. The development of stereolithography and other 3D printing methods has revolutionized the creation of dental models, prosthetics, and surgical devices.
The study focused on comparing the accuracy of three 3D printers based on a scanned initial model of a dental arch. Using the STL format for digital designs, complete arches were printed with specific resins on each printer. Subsequently, the printed models were evaluated through scanning and digital overlay comparison using Exocad software.
The results showed variations in accuracy among the printers, highlighting that the VeriBUILD 79200 was the most precise, followed by the 3D Sonic Mighty 4K and the UV MAX.
It was concluded that although 3D printers offer significant advantages in terms of detail reproduction, it is crucial to consider limitations and variability among models and technologies when selecting one for precise clinical applications in dentistry.
This study underscores the importance of ongoing research and future standardization of criteria to evaluate the accuracy of 3D printed models in dentistry, aiming to optimize clinical and educational outcomes in the field.
References
1. Rubio NA, Galante JM. CAM: Computer-Assisted Manufacturing. En: Galante JM, Rubio NA, Digital Dental Implantology: From Treatment Planning to Guided Surgery. 1 ed. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 45-66.
2. Medina-Sotomayor P, Ordóñez P, Ortega G. Accuracy of intraoral digital impression systems in restorative dentistry: A review of the literature. Odovtos - Int J Dent Sci. 2020;205:16.
3. César-Juárez ÁA, Olivos-Meza A, Landa-Solís C, Cárdenas-Soria VH, Silva-Bermúdez PS, Suárez Ahedo C, et al. Uso y aplicación de la tecnología de impresión y bioimpresión 3D en medicina. Rev Fac Med Univ Nac Auton Mex. 2018;61(6):43-51.
4. Dawood A, Marti Marti B, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J. 2015;219(11):521-9.
5. Emir F, Ceylan G, Ayyildiz S. In vitro accuracies of 3D printed models manufactured by two different printing technologies. Eur Oral Res. 2021;55(2):80-5.
6. Javaid M, Haleem A. Current status and applications of additive manufacturing in dentistry: A literature-based review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019;9(3):179-85.
7. Kim S-Y, Shin Y-S, Jung H-D, Hwang C-J, Baik H-S, Cha J-Y. Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;153(1):144-53.
8. Tsolakis IA, Papaioannou W, Papadopoulou E, Dalampira M, Tsolakis AI. Comparison in terms of accuracy between DLP and LCD printing technology for dental model printing. Dent J. 2022;10(10):181.
9. Escalona-Contreras N, Merino-Kutscher P, Cartes-Velásquez R. Uso de técnicas de impresión 3D en la reconstrucción mandibular. Una revisión breve. CES Odontol. 2021;34(2):159-72.
10. Moon W, Kim S, Lim B-S, Park Y-S, Kim RJ-Y, Chung SH. Dimensional accuracy evaluation of temporary dental restorations with different 3D printing systems. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(6):1487.
11. Bohner LOL, De Luca Canto G, Marció BS, Laganá DC, Sesma N, Tortamano Neto P. Computer-aided analysis of digital dental impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2017;118(5):617-23.
12. Whip mix VeriBUILD 3D printer [Internet]. Whip Mix. [citado el 22 de mayo de 2023]. Disponible en: https://www.whipmix.com/products/whip-mix-veribuild-dental-3d-printer
13. Phrozen Sonic Mini 4K resin 3D printer [Internet]. Phrozen Technology. [citado el 22 de mayo de 2023]. Disponible en: https://phrozen3d.com/collections/resin-3d-printer-phrozen/products/sonic-mini-4k-resin-3d-printer-phrozen?variant=39635278692539
14. 3D printers asiga [Internet]. Asiga.com. [citado el 22 de mayo de 2023]. Disponible en: https://www.asiga.com/3d-printers/
15. International Organization for Standardization. Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results Part 1: General Principles and Definitions (ISO 5725-1); International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland; 1994. Disponible en: https://www.iso.org/standard/11833.html
16. Medina-Sotomayor P, Ordóñez P, Ortega G. Accuracy of intraoral digital impression systems in restorative dentistry: A review of the literature. Odovtos - Int J Dent Sci [Internet]. 2020;205:16.
17. Loflin WA, English JD, Borders C, Harris LM, Moon A, Holland JN, et al. Effect of print layer height on the assessment of 3D-printed models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2019;156(2):283-9.
18. Zhang Z-C, Li P-L, Chu F-T, Shen G. Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy. J Orofac Orthop [Internet]. 2019;80(4):194-204.
19. Etemad-Shahidi Y, Qallandar OB, Evenden J, Alifui-Segbaya F, Ahmed KE. Accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed full-arch dental models: A systematic review. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2020;9(10):3357.
20. Jánosi KM, Cerghizan D, Mártha KI, Elekes É, Szakács B, Elekes Z, et al. Evaluation of intraoral full-arch scan versus conventional preliminary impression. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2023;12(17):5508.
21. Marconi S, Pugliese L, Botti M, Peri A, Cavazzi E, Latteri S, et al. Value of 3D printing for the comprehension of surgical anatomy. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2017;31(10):4102-10.
22. Lo Giudice A, Ronsivalle V, Rustico L, Aboulazm K, Isola G, Palazzo G. Evaluation of the accuracy of orthodontic models prototyped with entry-level LCD-based 3D printers: a study using surface-based superimposition and deviation analysis. Clin Oral Investig [Internet]. 2022;26(1):303-12.
23. Jang Y, Sim J-Y, Park J-K, Kim W-C, Kim H-Y, Kim J-H. Accuracy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated on 3D-printed casts. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2020;123(1):135-42.
24. Zhang H-R, Yin L-F, Liu Y-L, Yan L-Y, Wang N, Liu G, et al. Fabrication and accuracy research on 3D printing dental model based on cone beam computed tomography digital modeling. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi [Internet]. 2018;36(2):156-61.
25. Nestler N, Wesemann C, Spies BC, Beuer F, Bumann A. Dimensional accuracy of extrusion- and photopolymerization-based 3D printers: In vitro study comparing printed casts. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2021;125(1):103-10.
26. Alharbi N, Osman R, Wismeijer D. Factors influencing the dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed full-coverage dental restorations using stereolithography technology. Int J Prosthodont [Internet]. 2016;29(5):503-10.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sofia Kiefer (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
