Psychology and Public Health: Exploring the Dynamics of Subjective Well-being

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/hl2024.405

Keywords:

Psychology, Happiness, Public health, Determinants and correlates and Subjective well-being, Theories

Abstract

The study of psychology examines human thought and behaviour, which are essential for understanding public health, as many health outcomes are closely tied to human activities. Poor habits such as smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, unhealthy eating, and lack of exercise significantly affect health. This research employed a combination of online academic databases and search engines to gather articles that explore the connection between public health psychology and subjective well-being (SWB). Key sources included Google Scholar and PsycINFO, focusing on literature relevant to SWB factors and theories. Selection criteria emphasized relevance, interdisciplinary approaches, journal impact, research location, and accuracy. Over 50 research publications were analysed, with 20 summarized for this study, centring on SWB empirical literature. Four broad theoretical categories were identified: evaluative theories, fulfilment and commitment theories, emotional theories, and personal orientation theories. Analysis revealed inconsistencies in theoretical and procedural frameworks, complicating systematic comparison of empirical findings. The research identified seven key factors influencing SWB: personality, socioeconomic status (SES), community support, faith and social norms, basic participant characteristics, and geography and infrastructure. These determinants highlight opportunities to strengthen the link between theory and empirical research. Furthermore, overlaps among determinants and theoretical categories suggest the potential for simultaneously testing multiple theories. This integrative approach could advance our understanding of SWB and its impact on public health. 

References

1. Paul H, Bamel U, Ashta A, Stokes P. Examining an integrative model of resilience, subjective well-being and commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship behaviours. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. 2019 Oct 1;27(5):1274-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-08-2018-1514

2. Das KV, Jones-Harrell C, Fan Y, Ramaswami A, Orlove B, Botchwey N. Understanding subjective well-being: perspectives from psychology and public health. Public Health Reviews. 2020 Dec;41:1-32. 10.1186/s40985-020-00142-5

3. Krok D, Zarzycka B, Telka E. Risk of contracting COVID-19, personal resources and subjective well-being among healthcare workers: The mediating role of stress and meaning-making. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021 Jan 2;10(1):132. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10010132

4. Cattelino E, Testa S, Calandri E, Fedi A, Gattino S, Graziano F, Rollero C, Begotti T. Self-efficacy, subjective well-being and positive coping in adolescents with regard to Covid-19 lockdown. Current Psychology. 2023 Jul;42(20):17304-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01965-4

5. Anglim J, Horwood S, Smillie LD, Marrero RJ, Wood JK. Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin. 2020 Apr;146(4):279. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/bul0000226

6. Yıldırım M, Arslan G. Exploring the associations between resilience, dispositional hope, preventive behaviours, subjective well-being, and psychological health among adults during early stage of COVID-19. Current psychology. 2022 Aug;41(8):5712-22. 10.1007/s12144-020-01177-2

7. Darvishmotevali M, Ali F. Job insecurity, subjective well-being and job performance: The moderating role of psychological capital. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2020 May 1;87:102462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102462

8. González-Díaz RR, Acevedo-Duque Á, Salazar-Sepúlveda G, Castillo D. Contributions of subjective well-being and good living to the contemporary development of the notion of sustainable human development. Sustainability. 2021 Mar 17;13(6):3298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063298

9. Roxas MM, David AP, Aruta JJ. Compassion, forgiveness and subjective well-being among Filipino counseling professionals. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling. 2019 Jun 15;41:272-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-019-09374-w

10. Kim J, James JD. Sport and happiness: Understanding the relations among sport consumption activities, long-and short-term subjective well-being, and psychological need fulfillment. Journal of Sport Management. 2019 Mar 1;33(2):119-32. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2018-0071

11. Nikolaev B, Boudreaux CJ, Wood M. Entrepreneurship and subjective well-being: The mediating role of psychological functioning. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2020 May;44(3):557-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719830314

12. Lee S. Subjective well-being and mental health during the pandemic outbreak: Exploring the role of institutional trust. Research on Aging. 2022 Jan;44(1):10-21. DOI: 10.1177/0164027520975145

13. Hope NH, Holding AC, Verner-Filion J, Sheldon KM, Koestner R. The path from intrinsic aspirations to subjective well-being is mediated by changes in basic psychological need satisfaction and autonomous motivation: A large prospective test. Motivation and Emotion. 2019 Apr 1;43:232-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9733-z

14. Bożek A, Nowak PF, Blukacz M. The relationship between spirituality, health-related behavior, and psychological well-being. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020 Aug 14;11:1997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01997

15. Mitra R, Waygood EO, Fullan J. Subjective well-being of Canadian children and youth during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of the social and physical environment and healthy movement behaviours. Preventive Medicine Reports. 2021 Sep 1;23:101404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101404

16. Voukelatou V, Gabrielli L, Miliou I, Cresci S, Sharma R, Tesconi M, Pappalardo L. Measuring objective and subjective well-being: dimensions and data sources. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics. 2021 May;11:279-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-020-00224-2

17. Sharifi F, Levin I, Stone WM, Nygaard A. Green space and subjective well-being in the Just City: A scoping review. Environmental Science & Policy. 2021 Jun 1;120:118-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.03.008

18. Nie P, Ma W, Sousa-Poza A. The relationship between smartphone use and subjective well-being in rural China. Electronic Commerce Research. 2021 Dec;21(4):983-1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09397-1

19. Šakan D, Žuljević D, Rokvić N. The role of basic psychological needs in well-being during the COVID-19 outbreak: A self-determination theory perspective. Frontiers in Public Health. 2020 Nov 12;8:583181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.583181

20. Horwood S, Anglim J. Problematic smartphone usage and subjective and psychological well-being. Computers in Human Behavior. 2019 Aug 1;97:44-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.028.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Bhardwaj R, Singh Choudhary A, Patel DJ, Biswal B, Lovish D, Patil TA. Psychology and Public Health: Exploring the Dynamics of Subjective Well-being. Health Leadership and Quality of Life [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 30 [cited 2025 Aug. 24];3:.405. Available from: https://hl.ageditor.ar/index.php/hl/article/view/405