Innovative Teaching Methods in Healthcare Education: A Comparative analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/hl2024.394

Keywords:

Researcher, Post-Acute, Leadership, Outcomes, Positive, Cultivate

Abstract

Introduction: Background This analysis presented innovative health leadership models for improving the quality of life in post-acute care. Its objective was to address the increasing demand for best-practice leadership strategies to enhance patient outcomes and service delivery.
Methods: The researcher utilized a mixed-methods study using quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews with healthcare workers from different post-acute facilities. The study looked at data from 150 participants to determine the effect of different leadership models on care quality and staff satisfaction. Potential leadership models were transformational, transactional, and servant leadership.
Results: The results demonstrated a significant impact of the transactional leadership models on improving the quality of life. This model yielded better patient satisfaction scores and improved patient outcomes compared to transactional and servant leadership models. Staff in transformational leadership environments also had higher job satisfaction and lower levels of burnout.
Conclusions:We aimed to identify the leadership style most suited to post-acute care settings. Transformational leaders can improve patient care and job satisfaction by embracing empathy, communication, and empowerment. Disclaimer: This research suggested implementing transformational leadership educational programs to develop these skills in existing and future provider leaders as a means of enhancing life in post-acute care settings.

References

[1] Kumar Basak, S., Wotto, M., &Bélanger, P. (2018). E-learning, M-learning and D-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 191- 216.

[2] Pei, L., & Wu, H. (2019). Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical education online, 24(1), 1666538.

[3] Almeida, F., &Simoes, J. (2019). The role of serious games, gamification and industry 4.0 tools in the education 4.0 paradigm. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(2), 120- 136.

[4] Zapata-Cuervo, N., Montes-Guerra, M. I., Shin, H. H., Jeong, M., & Cho, M. H. (2023). Students’ psychological perceptions toward online learning engagement and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis of students in three different countries. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 35(2), 108-122.

[5] van Gaalen, A. E., Brouwer, J., Schönrock-Adema, J., Bouwkamp-Timmer, T., Jaarsma, A. D. C., &Georgiadis, J. R. (2021). Gamification of health professions education: a systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 26(2), 683-711.

[6] Papapanou, M., Routsi, E., Tsamakis, K., Fotis, L., Marinos, G., Lidoriki, I., ...&Schizas, D. (2022). Medical education challenges and innovations during COVID-19 pandemic. Postgraduate medical journal, 98(1159), 321-327.

[7] HinojoLucena, F. J., Lopez Belmonte, J., Fuentes Cabrera, A., Trujillo Torres, J. M., &Pozo Sanchez, S. (2020). Academic effects of the use of flipped learning in physical education. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(1), 276.

[8] Salam, M., AwangIskandar, D. N., Ibrahim, D. H. A., &Farooq, M. S. (2019). Service learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20, 573-593.

[9] Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., & Wilson, C. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: a systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1), 1-32.

[10] Forsetlund, L., O'Brien, M. A., Forsen, L., Mwai, L., Reinar, L. M., Okwen, M. P., ...& Rose, C. J. (2021). Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, (9).

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Soni I, Mane M, Singh SK, Upadhye VJ, Deo RC, Saini P, et al. Innovative Teaching Methods in Healthcare Education: A Comparative analysis. Health Leadership and Quality of Life [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 30 [cited 2025 Aug. 24];3:.394. Available from: https://hl.ageditor.ar/index.php/hl/article/view/394