Impact of 3D Printing Technologies in Digital Dentistry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/hl2023290Keywords:
digital dentistry, 3D printing, stereolithography, dental models, CAD-CAMAbstract
Introduction
The advent of digital scanners and 3D printing technologies transformed the dental field by facilitating more accurate and complete impressions of the patient's mouth. These tools made it possible to replace conventional impressions, reducing working times, improving patient comfort and optimizing archiving. In addition, the combination of digital scans and 3D printing opened up new possibilities for the customized production of dental models and devices.
Development
The CAD-CAM system was central to this evolution, enabling the creation of digital three-dimensional models that materialized into physical objects through additive methods such as 3D printing. This process involved precision at every stage, from the quality of the scanning to the technology used for printing. Among the available methods, stereolithography (SLA, DLP, LCD) stood out for its ability to reproduce complex details by photopolymerizing liquid resins with ultraviolet light. Each technology presented particular advantages, such as speed and surface quality, being evaluated according to factors such as cost, biocompatibility and clinical specifications.
Conclusion
The implementation of 3D printing technologies in dentistry provided an efficient and accurate solution for fabricating customized dental models. This advance significantly improved clinical planning and the quality of dental treatment. Comparing the accuracy of various technologies allowed the identification of optimal tools according to specific needs, ensuring better patient outcomes.
References
Rubio NA, Galante JM. CAM: Computer-Assisted Manufacturing. En: Galante JM, Rubio NA. Digital Dental Implantology: From Treatment Planning to Guided Surgery. 1 ed. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 45-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65947-9_3
Medina-Sotomayor P, Ordóñez P, Ortega G. Accuracy of intraoral digital impression systems in restorative dentistry: A review of the literature. Odovtos - Int J Dent Sci. 2020; 205:16.
César-Juárez ÁA, Olivos-Meza A, Landa-Solís C, Cárdenas-Soria VH, Silva-Bermúdez PS, Suárez Ahedo C, et al. Uso y aplicación de la tecnología de impresión y bioimpresión 3D en medicina. Rev Fac Med Univ Nac Auton Mex. 2018;61(6):43-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fm.24484865e.2018.61.6.07
Dawood A, Marti Marti B, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J. 2015;219(11):521-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.914
Emir F, Ceylan G, Ayyildiz S. In vitro accuracies of 3D printed models manufactured by two different printing technologies. Eur Oral Res. 2021;55(2):80-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20210060
Javaid M, Haleem A. Current status and applications of additive manufacturing in dentistry: A literature-based review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019;9(3):179-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.04.004
Kim S-Y, Shin Y-S, Jung H-D, Hwang C-J, Baik H-S, Cha J-Y. Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;153(1):144-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.05.025
Tsolakis IA, Papaioannou W, Papadopoulou E, Dalampira M, Tsolakis AI. Comparison in terms of accuracy between DLP and LCD printing technology for dental model printing. Dent J. 2022;10(10):181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10100181
Escalona-Contreras N, Merino-Kutscher P, Cartes-Velásquez R. Uso de técnicas de impresión 3D en la reconstrucción mandibular. Una revisión breve. CES Odontol. 2021;34(2):159-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21615/cesodon.5939
Moon W, Kim S, Lim B-S, Park Y-S, Kim RJ-Y, Chung SH. Dimensional accuracy evaluation of temporary dental restorations with different 3D printing systems. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(6):1487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14061487
Bohner LOL, De Luca Canto G, Marció BS, Laganá DC, Sesma N, Tortamano Neto P. Computer-aided analysis of digital dental impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2017;118(5):617-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.11.018
Whip mix VeriBUILD 3D printer [Internet]. Whip Mix. [citado el 22 de mayo de 2023]. Disponible en: https://www.whipmix.com/products/whip-mix-veribuild-dental-3d-printer
Phrozen Sonic Mini 4K resin 3D printer [Internet]. Phrozen Technology. [citado el 22 de mayo de 2023]. Disponible en: https://phrozen3d.com/collections/resin-3d-printer-phrozen/products/sonic-mini-4k-resin-3d-printer-phrozen?variant=39635278692539
3D printers asiga [Internet]. Asiga.com. [citado el 22 de mayo de 2023]. Disponible en: https://www.asiga.com/3d-printers/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2022-0045
International Organization for Standardization. Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results Part 1: General Principles and Definitions (ISO 5725-1). Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 1994 [citado el 22 de mayo de 2023]. Disponible en: https://www.iso.org/standard/11833.html
Medina-Sotomayor P, Ordóñez P, Ortega G. Accuracy of intraoral digital impression systems in restorative dentistry: A review of the literature. Odovtos - Int J Dent Sci [Internet]. 2020;205:16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2020.41442
Loflin WA, English JD, Borders C, Harris LM, Moon A, Holland JN, et al. Effect of print layer height on the assessment of 3D-printed models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2019;156(2):283-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.02.013
Zhang Z-C, Li P-L, Chu F-T, Shen G. Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy. J Orofac Orthop [Internet]. 2019;80(4):194-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-019-00180-y
Etemad-Shahidi Y, Qallandar OB, Evenden J, Alifui-Segbaya F, Ahmed KE. Accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed full-arch dental models: A systematic review. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2020;9(10):3357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103357
Jánosi KM, Cerghizan D, Mártha KI, Elekes É, Szakács B, Elekes Z, et al. Evaluation of intraoral full-arch scan versus conventional preliminary impression. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2023;12(17):5508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175508
Marconi S, Pugliese L, Botti M, Peri A, Cavazzi E, Latteri S, et al. Value of 3D printing for the comprehension of surgical anatomy. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2017;31(10):4102-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5457-5
Lo Giudice A, Ronsivalle V, Rustico L, Aboulazm K, Isola G, Palazzo G. Evaluation of the accuracy of orthodontic models prototyped with entry-level LCD-based 3D printers: a study using surface-based superimposition and deviation analysis. Clin Oral Investig [Internet]. 2022;26(1):303-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03999-1
Jang Y, Sim J-Y, Park J-K, Kim W-C, Kim H-Y, Kim J-H. Accuracy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated on 3D-printed casts. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2020;123(1):135-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.004
Zhang H-R, Yin L-F, Liu Y-L, Yan L-Y, Wang N, Liu G, et al. Fabrication and accuracy research on 3D printing dental model based on cone beam computed tomography digital modeling. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi [Internet]. 2018;36(2):156-61.
Nestler N, Wesemann C, Spies BC, Beuer F, Bumann A. Dimensional accuracy of extrusion- and photopolymerization-based 3D printers: In vitro study comparing printed casts. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2021;125(1):103-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.011
Alharbi N, Osman R, Wismeijer D. Factors influencing the dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed full-coverage dental restorations using stereolithography technology. Int J Prosthodont [Internet]. 2016;29(5):503-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4835
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sofia Kiefer (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.