Implementing Automated Systems for Improved Environmental Health Monitoring
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/hl2023246Keywords:
Environmental Health Monitoring, Automated Systems, IoT Sensors, Machine Learning, Predictive Analytics, Public HealthAbstract
These approaches seem to totally alter our handling of environmental health hazards, therefore improving public health management and results. Under this method, IoT-equipped sensors are combined into a network that real-time gathers and analyses environmental data. Analysing this data, machine learning algorithms find possible health hazards, project patterns, and provide useful insights. Because the technology is scalable and flexible, it may be used anywhere—from rural to metropolitan locations. Compared to conventional techniques, automated solutions greatly increase the efficiency of data collecting and risk assessment, therefore saving the time and effort needed. Furthermore, the incorporation of predictive analytics lets one react to environmental risks pro-actively, hence improving public health results. Moreover, the automated environmental health monitoring systems provide governments and companies assigned to cover vast regions with a more affordable alternative. Automated systems used in environmental health monitoring provide significant gains in data accuracy, timeliness, and resource allocation in the implementation. These solutions are ready to transform the way we control environmental health hazards, therefore improving public health management and results.
References
Villa-Henriksen, A.; Edwards, G.T.; Pesonen, L.A.; Green, O.; Sørensen, C.A.G. Internet of Things in arable farming: Implementation, applications, challenges and potential. Biosyst. Eng. 2020, 191, 60–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.12.013
Xu, G.; Li, H.; Liu, S.; Yang, K.; Lin, X. VerifyNet: Secure and Verifiable Federated Learning. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2019, 15, 911–926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2019.2929409
Sinha, B.B.; Dhanalakshmi, R. Recent advancements and challenges of Internet of Things in smart agriculture: A survey. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2022, 126, 169–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.08.006
Li, D.; Du, L. AUV Trajectory Tracking Models and Control Strategies: A Review. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 1020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9091020
Aguirre-Castro, O.A.; Inzunza-González, E.; García-Guerrero, E.E.; Tlelo-Cuautle, E.; López-Bonilla, O.R.; Olguín-Tiznado, J.E.; Cárdenas-Valdez, J.R. Design and Construction of an ROV for Underwater Exploration. Sensors 2019, 19, 5387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19245387
Peng, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, D.; Han, Q.-L. An Overview of Recent Advances in Coordinated Control of Multiple Autonomous Surface Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2020, 17, 732–745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.3004343
Allen, B.; Stokey, R.; Austin, T.; Forrester, N.; Goldsborough, R.; Purcell, M.; von Alt, C. REMUS: A Small Low-Cost AUV: System Description, Field Trials, Performance Results. In Proceedings of the Oceans 97. MTS/IEEE Conference Proceedings, Halifax, NS, Canada, 6–9 October 1997; pp. 994–1000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.1997.624126
Yang, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Li, T. A Survey of Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Formation: Performance, Formation Control, and Communication Capability. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2021, 23, 815–841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2021.3059998
Salalila, A.; Martinez, J.; Elsinghorst, R.; Hou, H.; Yuan, Y.; Deng, Z.D. Realtime and Autonomous Water Quality Monitoring System Based on Remotely Operated Vehicle. In Proceedings of the Global Oceans 2020: Singapore—U.S. Gulf Coast, Biloxi, MS, USA, 5–30 October 2020; pp. 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEECONF38699.2020.9389374
Raj, R.; Kos, A. A Comprehensive Study of Mobile Robot: History, Developments, Applications, and Future Research Perspectives. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12146951
Wijayathunga, L.; Rassau, A.; Chai, D. Challenges and Solutions for Autonomous Ground Robot Scene Understanding and Navigation in Unstructured Outdoor Environments: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 9877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179877
Bruzzone, L.; Nodehi, S.E.; Fanghella, P. Tracked Locomotion Systems for Ground Mobile Robots: A Review. Machines 2022, 10, 648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10080648
Yaacoub, J.-P.A.; Noura, H.N.; Salman, O.; Chehab, A. Robotics cyber security: Vulnerabilities, attacks, countermeasures, and recommendations. Int. J. Inf. Secur. 2022, 21, 115–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-021-00545-8
Marshall, M.; Belgiu, M.; Boschetti, M.; Pepe, M.; Stein, A.; Nelson, A. Field-level crop yield estimation with PRISMA and Sentinel-2. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2022, 187, 191–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.03.008
Liu, Y.; Zhao, W.; Chen, S.; Ye, T. Mapping Crop Rotation by Using Deeply Synergistic Optical and SAR Time Series. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13204160
Shan, J.; Toth, C.K. Topographic Laser Ranging and Scanning: Principles and Processing; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315154381
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hari Narayan Hota, Debasmita Tripathy, Malathi.H, Nikhilchandra Mahajan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
