Analysis of Long-Term Health Outcomes Following Occupational Safety Interventions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/hl2023236

Keywords:

Occupational safety, long-term health outcomes, workplace injuries, safety interventions, health improvements, ergonomic programs

Abstract

Abstract: Long-term health effects of occupational safety measures are very important for figuring out how well they work at keeping workers from getting hurt or sick on the job. This study looks into what happens when different safety rules are put in place across many businesses over a long length of time. By looking at a lot of old information, like health records and safety compliance reports, the study finds patterns in how health improved at work after safety measures were put in place. There is a much higher chance of job dangers in fields like manufacturing, building, healthcare, and agriculture that are part of the study. Personal protective equipment (PPE), ergonomic changes, safety training programs, and regulatory compliance measures are some of the most important safety interventions that were looked at. There are both qualitative and quantitative methods used in the process. It is done using a longitudinal group study methodology, which lets health effects be tracked over time. Some of the health outcomes that are looked at are the number of musculoskeletal disorders, respiratory disorders, mental health problems, and deaths from injuries. A mixed-methods technique was used, which included expert conversations, worker comments, and statistical analysis. Chi-square tests, regression models, and survival analysis are used in the statistical analysis to look at the link between safety interventions and health outcomes. The results show that the number of injuries and illnesses related to work is significantly lower in sectors with strong safety measures compared to those with few or no interventions. Musculoskeletal disorders went down by 30% when ergonomic programs were put in place in manufacturing, and stress-related disorders went down by 25% when mental health programs were put in place in healthcare. Safety training programs have also helped bring down the number of fatal accidents in high-risk industries.

References

Blustein, D.L.; Olle, C.; Connors-Kellgren, A.; Diamonti, A.J. Decent work: A psychological perspective. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 407.

DeBord, D.G.; Carreon, T.; Lentz, T.J.; Middendorf, P.J.; Hoover, M.D.; Schulte, P.A. The use of the “exposome” in the practice of epidemiology: A primer on omic-technologies. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2016, 184, 304–314.

Dugan, A.G.; Punnett, L. Dissemination and Implementation research for occupational safety and heats. Occup. Health Sci. 2017, 1, 29–45.

Ganzleben, C.; Antignac, J.-P.; Barouki, R.; Castaño, A.; Fiddicke, U.; Klánová, J.K.; Lebret, E.; Olea, N.; Sarigiannis, D.; Schoeters, G.R.; et al. Human biomonitoring as a tool to support chemicals regulation in the European Union. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 220, 94–97.

Oeij, P.R.A.; Rus, D.; Pot, F.D. (Eds.) Workplace Innovation: Theory, Research and Practice; Volume in a Series: Aligning Perspectives on Health, Safety and Well-Being; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017.

Sauter, S.; Hurrell, J.J. Occupational heath contributions to the development and promise of occupational health psychology. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2017, 22, 251–258.

Iavicoli, S.; Valenti, A.; Gagliardi, D.; Cantanen, J. Ethics and occupational health in the contemporary world and work. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1713.

Shukla, P.; Lee, M.; Whitman, S.A.; Pine, K.H. Delay of routine health care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A theoretical model of individuals’ risk assessment and decision making. Soc. Sci. Med. 2022, 307, 115164.

Sheldon, G.F.; Ricketts, T.C.; Charles, A.; King, J.; Fraher, E.P.; Meyer, A. The global health workforce shortage: Role of surgeons and other providers. Adv. Surg. 2008, 42, 63–85.

Dee, J.; Dhuhaibawi, N.; Hayden, J.C. A systematic review and pooled prevalence of burnout in pharmacists. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 2022, 1–10.

Bykov, K.V.; Zrazhevskaya, I.A.; Topka, E.O.; Peshkin, V.N.; Dobrovolsky, A.P.; Isaev, R.N.; Orlov, A.M. Prevalence of burnout among psychiatrists: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2022, 308, 47–64.

Romero-Sanchez, J.M.; Porcel-Galvez, A.M.; Paloma-Castro, O.; Garcia-Jimenez, J.; Gonzalez-Dominguez, M.E.; Palomar-Aumatell, X.; Fernandez-Garcia, E. Worldwide prevalence of inadequate work ability among hospital nursing personnel: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 2022, 54, 513–528.

Garus-Pakowska, A.; Gorajski, M. Epidemiology of needlestick and sharp injuries among health care workers based on records from 252 hospitals for the period 2010–2014, Poland. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 634.

Wizner, K.; Gaspar, F.W.; Biggio, A.; Wiesner, S. Occupational injuries in California’s health care and social assistance industry, 2009 to 2018. Health Sci. Rep. 2021, 4, e306.

Sohrabi, Y.; Yarmohammadi, H.; Pouya, A.B.; Arefi, M.F.; Hassanipour, S.; Poursadeqiyan, M. Prevalence of job burnout in Iranian nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Work 2022, 73, 937–943.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

1.
Mane M, Kumar Mishra A, Sekhar Patro P, B.Mane M. Analysis of Long-Term Health Outcomes Following Occupational Safety Interventions. Health Leadership and Quality of Life [Internet]. 2023 Dec. 31 [cited 2025 Aug. 30];2:236. Available from: https://hl.ageditor.ar/index.php/hl/article/view/236