Analyzing Behavioural Health Interventions and Their Impact on Occupational Safety
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/hl2023229Keywords:
Behavioral Health Interventions, Occupational Safety, Workplace Hazards, Stress Management, Employee Well-beingAbstract
Behavioural health treatments are very important for improving workplace safety because they deal with the mental and behavioural issues that cause risks in the workplace. Integrating mental health tactics into safety measures has become more important as workplaces get more complicated. This essay looks into different mental health treatments and how they can help make workplaces safer. The main goal is to find out how different methods, like stress management, mindfulness, resilience training, and cognitive-behavioral treatment, can help workers avoid crashes, injuries, and long-term health problems at work. This research uses a variety of methods, mixing both personal and quantitative data from a wide range of fields, such as healthcare, transportation, building, and manufacturing. A study was done to see the differences between organisations that have used behavioural health treatments and those that have not. Particularly those resulting from human error, the findings reveal a clear correlation between mental health initiatives and less accidents at workplace. These programs helped participants manage their emotions, deal with stress, and approach problems as they arose. These elements taken together make the workplace safer. Companies who applied these techniques also reported that their employees were generally more content, more involved, and more efficient. This emphasises even more the need of adding mental health into safety precautions at employment. This paper also addresses the issues that arise when attempting to implement these sorts of initiatives, including insufficient funds, management and employees not following through, and the requirement of long-term commitment to training and resources. The study emphasises the importance of implementing unique adjustments according to the demands of every company. Remember that safety at work is complex even as businesses keep giving health and safety first priority. Physical and psychological elements must be considered concurrently if one is to create a safe, healthy workplace environment.
References
Dyreborg, J.; Lipscomb, H.J.; Nielsen, K.; Törner, M.; Rasmussen, K.; Frydendall, K.B.; Bay, H.; Gensby, U.; Bengtsen, E.; Guldenmund, F.; et al. Safety interventions for the prevention of accidents at work: A systematic review. Campbell Syst. Rev. 2022, 18, 1234.
Webb, T.; Joseph, J.; Yardley, L.; Michie, S. Using the internet to promote health behaviour change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behaviour change techniques, and model of delivery on efficacy. J. Med. Internet Res. 2010, 12, e1376.
Kerr, M.J.; Savik, K.; Monsen, K.A.; Lusk, S.L. Effectiveness of computer-based tailoring versus targeting to promote use of hearing protection. Can. J. Nurs. Res. Arch. 2007, 39, 80–97.
Glanz, K.; Bishop, D.B. The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2010, 31, 399–418.
Milton, A.C.; Mullan, B.A. An application of the theory of planned behavior—A randomized controlled food safety pilot intervention for young adults. Health Psychol. 2012, 31, 250. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Kothe, E.J.; Mullan, B.A.; Butow, P. Promoting fruit and vegetable consumption. Testing an intervention based on the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite 2012, 58, 997–1004. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Sainsbury, K.; Mullan, B.; Sharpe, L. A randomized controlled trial of an online intervention to improve gluten-free diet adherence in celiac disease. Off. J. Am. Coll. Gastroenterol. ACG 2013, 108, 811–817.
Hardeman, W.; Johnston, M.; Johnston, D.; Bonetti, D.; Wareham, N.; Kinmonth, A.L. Application of the theory of planned behaviour in behaviour change interventions: A systematic review. Psychol. Health 2002, 17, 123–158.
Skowron-Grabowska, B.; Sobociński, M.D. Behaviour-based safety (BBS)-advantages and criticism. Prod. Eng. Arch. 2018, 20, 12–15.
Nahrgang, J.D.; Morgeson, F.P.; Hofmann, D.A. Safety at work: A meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 2011, 96, 71.
Fabiano, B.; Pettinato, M.; Currò, F.; Reverberi, A.P. A field study on human factor and safety performances in a downstream oil industry. Saf. Sci. 2022, 153, 105795.
Yassi, A.; Lockhart, K.; Sykes, M.; Buck, B.; Stime, B.; Spiegel, J.M. Effectiveness of joint health and safety committees: A realist review. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2013, 56, 424–438.
Caffaro, F.; Cremasco, M.M.; Bagagiolo, G.; Vigoroso, L.; Cavallo, E. Effectiveness of occupational safety and health training for migrant farmworkers: A scoping review. Public Health 2018, 160, 10–17.
DeRoo, L.A.; Rautiainen, R.H. A systematic review of farm safety interventions. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2000, 18, 51–62.
Feltner, C.; Peterson, K.; Palmieri Weber, R.; Cluff, L.; Coker-Schwimmer, E.; Viswanathan, M.; Lohr, K.N. The effectiveness of Total worker health interventions: A systematic review for a National Institutes of Health pathways to prevention workshop. Ann. Intern. Med. 2016, 165, 262–269.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Deepak Kumar Parhi, Pooja Varma, Archana Singh, S. A. Surale-Patil (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.