Instructional Strategies for Incorporating Quality of Life Paradigms in Medical Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/hl2023226Keywords:
Quality of Life (QoL), Medical Education, Instructional Strategies, Patient-Centered Learning, Holistic Healthcare TrainingAbstract
Introduction: Adding Quality of Life (QoL) concepts to medical education is a big step forward in making sure those future doctors and nurses understand all of their patients' needs. This essay looks at the best ways to teach medical subjects so that they include quality of life (QoL) issues, with the goal of improving both student learning and patient care.
Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used, with both qualitative conversations with medical trainers and a quantitative poll given to medical students at different points in their education. The study looked at how these tactics affected students' knowledge and ability to deal with quality of life problems.
Findings: These show that engaging, patient-centered learning experiences, like models and patient accounts, help students understand and value QoL aspects in hospital situations a lot more. Using training methods from different fields together is also very important because it helps students see the social, psychological, and physical parts of patient care in a bigger picture.
Conclusion: The study shows how important it is to include quality of life (QoL) in medical education. This way of teaching not only prepares future doctors to provide caring, patient-centered care, but it also helps them make smart, caring decisions in their practice. By using these teaching methods, we can connect the gap between standard medical education and the growing focus on patient well-being in healthcare.
References
1. Lu, Y.; Zheng, H.; Chand, S.; Xia, W.; Liu, Z.; Xu, X.; Wang, L.; Qin, Z.; Bao, J. Outlook on human-centric manufacturing towards Industry 5.0. J. Manuf. Syst. 2022, 62, 612–627.
2. European Commission; Directorate-General for Research Innovation; Renda, A.; Schwaag Serger, S.; Tataj, D.; Morlet, A.; Isaksson, D.; Martins, F.; Mir Roca, M. Industry 5.0, a transformative Vision for Europe: Governing Systemic Transformations towards a Sustainable Industry; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2022.
3. Kolade, O.; Owoseni, A. Employment 5.0: The work of the future and the future of work. Technol. Soc. 2022, 71, 102086.
4. Vicente, A.M.; Ballensiefen, W.; Jönsson, J.-I. How personalised medicine will transform healthcare by 2030: The ICPerMed vision. J. Transl. Med. 2020, 18, 180.
5. Vignali, V.; Hines, P.A.; Cruz, A.G.; Ziętek, B.; Herold, R. Health horizons: Future trends and technologies from the European Medicines Agency’s horizon scanning collaborations. Front. Med. 2022, 9.
6. Ceross, A.; Bergmann, J. Evaluating the Presence of Software-as-a-Medical-Device in the Australian Therapeutic Goods Register. Prosthesis 2021, 3, 221–228.
7. Iqbal, J.D.; Biller-Andorno, N. The regulatory gap in digital health and alternative pathways to bridge it. Health Policy Technol. 2022, 11, 100663.
8. Mahaswar Sahu, Sweta Leena Hota. (2015). Customer Relationship Management in Banking—A Strategic Tool Adopted By Banks. International Journal on Research and Development - A Management Review, 4(4), 19 - 22.
9. Muhammed Juman.B K, J Christoher. (2015). A Study on Direct Selling Business (Amway India Ltd) in Kerala: A Case Study of Calicut District of Kerala. International Journal on Research and Development - A Management Review, 4(4), 23 - 30.
10. Yan, K.; Balijepalli, C.; Druyts, E. The Impact of Digital Therapeutics on Current Health Technology Assessment Frameworks. Front. Digit. Health 2021, 3, 667016.
11. Von Huben, A.; Howell, M.; Carrello, J.; Norris, S.; Wortley, S.; Ritchie, A.; Howard, K. Application of a health technology assessment framework to digital health technologies that manage chronic disease: A systematic review. Int. J Ttechnol. Assess. Health Care 2022, 38, e9.
12. Richardson, S.; Lawrence, K.; Schoenthaler, A.M.; Mann, D. A framework for digital health equity. NPJ Digit. Med. 2022, 5, 119.
13. Lawrence, K. Digital Health Equity. In Digital Health; Linwood, S.L., Ed.; Exon Publications: Brisbane, Australia, 2022.
14. Kaihlanen, A.-M.; Virtanen, L.; Buchert, U.; Safarov, N.; Valkonen, P.; Hietapakka, L.; Hörhammer, I.; Kujala, S.; Kouvonen, A.; Heponiemi, T. Towards digital health equity - A qualitative study of the challenges experienced by vulnerable groups in using digital health services in the COVID-19 era. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2022, 22, 188.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Maria Belen Cardoso , Sergio Dario Verdu , Virginia jewtuchowicz (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.