The Integration of Quality of Life Evaluations into Standard Healthcare Management Protocols
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/hl2023225Keywords:
Patient-centered care, Quality of Life (QoL), Healthcare management, QoL instruments, Treatment outcomes, Health policyAbstract
Making treatment more patient-centered mostly depends on including Quality of Life (QoL) testing into regular healthcare operations. This approach shifts the traditional emphasis from gauging illness to considering a patient's complete health. Regular medical practice's use of QoL testing enables physicians to better understand, on a larger scale, how disease and therapy influence patients' daily life including their physical, psychological, and social health. Key component of this mix is developing and using dependable, proven QoL methods tailored for various patient groups and circumstances. These instruments help one to extra precisely evaluate the mental fitness situation and degree of existence pride of the sufferers. While physicians use those insights while making medical decisions, they may provide sufferers with treatment options that not handiest advantage their fitness but also supplement their very own values and life objective. Furthermore, consistent QoL evaluations enable one to monitor the long-term consequences of healthcare policies, thus guiding treatment programs and providing patient support services continuously. Early on discovery of issues compromising a patient's quality of life comes from proactive approach. This allows for fast therapies meant to prevent worsening of health. Including QoL evaluations has effects beyond just attending to one patient. It clarifies health impacts in a more intricate manner, which is rather crucial for allocating funds and formulating health policy. Healthcare systems may transform to better, more long-lasting, and more compassionate approaches of controlling illness and health by first giving patient-reported outcomes first priority.
References
1. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71.
2. Arora, D.; Gupta, S.; Anpalagan, A. Evolution and Adoption of Next Generation IoT-Driven Health Care 4.0 Systems. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2022, 127, 3533–3613.
3. Yang, G.; Pang, Z.; Deen, M.J.; Dong, M.; Zhang, Y.-T.; Lovell, N.; Rahmani, A.M. Homecare Robotic Systems for Healthcare 4.0: Visions and Enabling Technologies. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2020, 24, 2535–2549.
4. Puri, V.; Kataria, A.; Sharma, V. Artificial intelligence-powered decentralized framework for Internet of Things in Healthcare 4.0. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2021, 35, e4245.
5. Hathaliya, J.J.; Tanwar, S.; Evans, R. Securing electronic healthcare records: A mobile-based biometric authentication approach. J. Inf. Secur. Appl. 2020, 53, 102528.
6. A K Sannigrahi. (2015). Challenges of Training in DRDO. International Journal on Research and Development - A Management Review, 4(1), 26 - 30.
7. Padmalita Routray, Pinakshi Bag. (2015). HRD Maturity-A Study in a Ferro Alloy Company. International Journal on Research and Development - A Management Review, 4(1), 31 - 44.
8. Tanwar, S. Data Security and Privacy Functions in Fog Computing for Healthcare 4.0. In Fog Data Analytics for IoT Applications; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2020; Volume 76, pp. 387–420.
9. Park, A.; Chang, H.; Lee, K.J. How to Sustain Smart Connected Hospital Services: An Experience from a Pilot Project on IoT-Based Healthcare Services. Healthc. Inform. Res. 2018, 24, 387–393.
10. Dachyar, M.; Zahra, N.A. The decision model of internet of things (Iot) solutions for healthcare based on risk and challenge factors. Proc. Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Oper. Manag. 2020, 59, 800–808.
11. Schut, A.-R.W.; Timbergen, M.J.M.; Lidington, E.; Grünhagen, D.J.; van der Graaf, W.T.A.; Sleijfer, S.; van Houdt, W.J.; Bonenkamp, J.J.; Younger, E.; Dunlop, A.; et al. The Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life Issues Experienced by Patients with Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis (The QUALIFIED Study)—A Protocol for an International Cohort Study. Cancers 2021, 13, 3068.
12. Van Houdt, W.J.; Husson, O.; Patel, A.; Jones, R.L.; Smith, M.J.F.; Miah, A.B.; Messiou, C.; Moskovic, E.; Al-Muderis, O.; Benson, C.; et al. Outcome of Primary Desmoid Tumors at All Anatomic Locations Initially Managed with Active Surveillance. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2019, 26, 4699–4706.
13. Timbergen, M.J.M.; van der Graaf, W.T.A.; Grunhagen, D.J.; Younger, E.; Sleijfer, S.; Dunlop, A.; Dean, L.; Verhoef, C.; van de Poll-Franse, L.V.; Husson, O. Assessing the Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis Patients’ Voice: Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life Experiences from Patients of Two Countries. Sarcoma 2020, 2020, 2141939.
14. Desmoid Tumor Working Group. The management of desmoid tumours: A joint global consensus-based guideline approach for adult and paediatric patients. Eur. J. Cancer 2020, 127, 96–107.
15. Timbergen, M.J.M.; Schut, A.W.; Grunhagen, D.J.; Sleijfer, S.; Verhoef, C. Active surveillance in desmoid-type fibromatosis: A systematic literature review. Eur. J. Cancer 2020, 137, 18–29.
16. Hernández-Segura, N.; Marcos-Delgado, A.; Pinto-Carral, A.; Fernández-Villa, T.; Molina, A.J. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Instruments and Mobility: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16493.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Kavina Ganapathy, Fazil Hasan, Tapas Ranjan Behera, V.M. Thorat, Pranoti Prashant Mane (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
