Evaluation of Healthcare Management Protocols and Their Implications for the Quality of Patient Care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/hl2023221Keywords:
Healthcare management, patient care, clinical protocols, evidence-based practices, patient outcomes, healthcare efficiencyAbstract
A big part of making sure that patients get good care is making sure that healthcare management practices work. It is necessary for medical offices to use organised procedures because more and more people want fast healthcare delivery systems. This study looks at different ways to handle healthcare systems and what effects they have on the overall level of care for patients. The study uses both qualitative and quantitative methods to look at how standard operating procedures affect the health of patients, the speed of operations, and the happiness of healthcare providers. The goal of healthcare management guidelines is to make things easier, cut down on medical mistakes, and make it easier for teams from different fields to work together. The study looks into a few methods that are used in a lot of different healthcare situations, like hospitals, outpatient offices, and long-term care centres. The study looks at these practices using data from case studies, patient polls, and professional performance measures to find out what works and what doesn't when it comes to keeping a high level of care. The results show that guidelines that focus on patient-centered care, practices that are backed by evidence, and ongoing feedback loops make patients happier, cut down on treatment delays, and improve clinical outcomes. But problems with following the rules, a lack of resources, and differences in the experience of healthcare providers were named as things that can make them less successful. The study also shows how important it is to make procedures flexible so they can be changed to fit the needs of each patient. This way, personalised care can be provided without lowering the standard or efficiency of the healthcare system. This study has important effects for healthcare managers, policymakers, and doctors who want to improve patient care through better management. The results support the idea that healthcare management practices should always be changing. They also stress the need for flexible strategies that can change to the needs of modern healthcare systems.
References
1. Lamothe, M.; Boujut, E.; Zenasni, F.; Sultan, S. To be or not to be empathic: The combined role of empathic concern and perspective taking in understanding burnout in general practice. BMC Fam. Pract. 2014, 15, 15.
2. Adamson, K.; Loomis, C.; Cadell, S.; Verweel, L.C. Interprofessional empathy: A four-stage model for a new understanding of teamwork. J. Interprof. Care 2018, 32, 752–761.
3. Derksen, F.; Bensing, J.; Lagro-Janssen, A. Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: A systematic review. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2013, 63, e76–e84.
4. Flickinger, T.E.; Saha, S.; Roter, D.; Korthuis, P.; Sharp, V.; Cohn, J.; Eggly, S.; Moore, R.D.; Beach, M.C. Clinician empathy is associated with differences in patient–clinician communication behaviors and higher medication self-efficacy in HIV care. Patient Educ. Couns. 2016, 99, 220–226.
5. Roter, D.L.; Frankel, R.M.; Hall, J.A.; Sluyter, D. The expression of emotion through nonverbal behavior in medical visits. Mechanisms and outcomes. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2006, 21 (Suppl. S1), S28–S34.
6. Hojat, M.; Louis, D.Z.; Markham, F.W.; Wender, R.; Rabinowitz, C.; Gonnella, J.S. Physicians’ Empathy and Clinical Outcomes for Diabetic Patients. Acad. Med. 2011, 86, 359–364.
7. Rakel, D.; Barrett, B.; Zhang, Z.; Hoeft, T.; Chewning, B.; Marchand, L.; Scheder, J. Perception of empathy in the therapeutic encounter: Effects on the common cold. Patient Educ. Couns. 2011, 85, 390–397.
8. Lown, B.A.; Dunne, H.; Muncer, S.J.; Chadwick, R. How important is compassionate healthcare to ? A comparison of the perceptions of people in the United States and Ireland. J. Res. Nurs. 2017, 22, 60–69.
9. Vedsted, P.; Heje, H.N. Association between patients’ recommendation of their GP and their evaluation of the GP. Scand. J. Prim. Health Care 2008, 26, 228–234.
10. Doohan, I.; Saveman, B.-I. Need for compassion in prehospital and emergency care: A qualitative study on bus crash survivors’ experiences. Int. Emerg. Nurs. 2015, 23, 115–119.
11. Sashikanta Khuntia, Subhodip Adhikary. (2015). Research Article On “A Study on Job Satisfaction and Performance of Management Guru’s of Management Colleges-with Reference to Odisha”. International Journal on Research and Development - A Management Review, 4(1), 94 - 100.
12. Debasmita Tripathy. (2015). Work Life Balance and the Gender Agenda in Facilitating Performance. International Journal on Research and Development - A Management Review, 4(1), 101 - 106.
13. Dilalla, L.F.; Hull, S.K.; Dorsey, J.K. Effect of gender, age, and relevant course work on attitudes toward empathy, patient spirituality, and physician wellness. Teach. Learn. Med. 2004, 16, 165–170.
14. Singer, T.; Klimecki, O.M. Empathy and compassion. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, R875–R878.
15. Teding van Berkhout, E.; Malouff, J.M. Link to external site this link will open in a new window. The efficacy of empathy training: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Couns. Psychol. 2016, 63, 32–41.
16. Riess, H.; Kelley, J.M.; Bailey, R.W.; Dunn, E.J.; Phillips, M. Empathy training for resident physicians: A randomized controlled trial of a neuroscience-informed curriculum. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2012, 27, 1280–1286.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Shilpi Singh, Sagar V. Joshi, Souvagya Panigrahi, Aparna Patange, Upendra Sharma.U.S (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
