Didactic innovation in the teaching of experimental sciences based on a competency-based approach: a review in the field of health sciences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/hl2023210Keywords:
Teaching innovation, experimental sciences, competency-based approach, health education, , active learningAbstract
Context:
The teaching of experimental sciences has evolved to meet the demands of a changing professional environment, integrating innovative competency-based approaches in fields such as health sciences.
Objective:
To analyze the implementation of innovative teaching strategies in health sciences and evaluate their ability to develop technical, practical, and transversal competencies in students.
Methodology:
A scoping review was conducted using the Scopus database, focusing on academic publications from 2018 to 2022. Studies on educational innovation were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively, identifying strategies, their impact on learning, and gaps in the literature.
Results:
The study found that methodologies such as problem-based learning, teamwork, and educational technologies are effective in fostering competencies like analytical thinking, communication, and collaboration. However, challenges remain, including teacher training, technological infrastructure, and the evaluation of transversal competencies.
Conclusion:
The integration of innovative methodologies in experimental sciences requires a holistic approach that addresses both technical and social aspects of learning, providing comprehensive and adaptable training to meet current needs
References
1. Giammatteo L, Obaya AV, Chemistry Department, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, Univerisdad Nacional Autónoma de México. Assessing Chemistry Laboratory Skills Through a Competency‑based Approach in High School Chemistry Course. Science Education International. 2018;29(2):103–9. http://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v29.i2.5
2. Jalali A, Jeong D, Sutherland S. Implementing a Competency-Based Approach to Anatomy Teaching: Beginning With the End in Mind. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development. 2020;7:2382120520907899. https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120520907899
3. Dankner R, Gabbay U, Leibovici L, Sadeh M, Sadetzki S. Implementation of a competency-based medical education approach in public health and epidemiology training of medical students. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research. 2018;7(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-017-0194-8
4. Giddens J. Demystifying Concept-Based and Competency-Based Approaches. Journal of Nursing Education. 2020;59(3):123–4. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20200220-01
5. Santos J, Figueiredo AS, Vieira M. Innovative pedagogical practices in higher education: An integrative literature review. Nurse Education Today. 2019;72:12–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.003
6. A. Bautista M, E. Cipagauta M. DIDACTIC TRENDS AND PERCEIVED TEACHERS’ TRAINING NEEDS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A CASE STUDY. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE). 2019;7(3):27–35. https://doi.org/10.5937/IJCRSEE1903071B
7. Chuenjitwongsa S, Oliver RG, Bullock AD. Competence, competency‐based education, and undergraduate dental education: a discussion paper. European Journal of Dental Education. 2018;22(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12213
8. Horntvedt MET, Nordsteien A, Fermann T, Severinsson E. Strategies for teaching evidence-based practice in nursing education: a thematic literature review. BMC Medical Education. 2018;18(1):172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1278-z
9. Sivarajah RT, Curci NE, Johnson EM, Lam DL, Lee JT, Richardson ML. A Review of Innovative Teaching Methods. Academic Radiology. 2019;26(1):101–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.03.025
10. Lucas-Oliva I, Toledo-Vega G, Núñez-Román F. From Neurodidactics to Language Teaching and Learning: The Emotional Approach. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 2022;12(8):1457–67. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1208.01
11. Putri AH, Samsudin A, Suhandi A. Exhaustive studies before covid-19 pandemic attack of students’ conceptual change in science education: A literature review. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 2022;19(3):808–29. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.151
12. Lawrence JE, Tar UA. Factors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process. Educational Media International. 2018;55(1):79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712
13. Seifu K. Determinants of information and communication technology integration in teaching-learning process at Aksum University. Cogent Education. 2020;7(1):1824577. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1824577
14. Alsawaier RS. The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology. 2018;35(1):56–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-02-2017-0009
15. Zainuddin Z, Chu SKW, Shujahat M, Perera CJ. The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review. 2020;30:100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326
16. Mystakidis S, Berki E, Valtanen JP. Deep and Meaningful E-Learning with Social Virtual Reality Environments in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(5):2412. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052412
17. Aljawarneh SA. Reviewing and exploring innovative ubiquitous learning tools in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2020;32(1):57–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09207-0
18. Le VT, Nguyen NH, Tran TLN, Nguyen LT, Nguyen TA, Nguyen MT. The interaction patterns of pandemic-initiated online teaching: How teachers adapted. System. 2022;105:102755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102755
19. Mishra L, Gupta T, Shree A. Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open. 2020;1:100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
20. González-Pérez LI, Ramírez-Montoya MS. Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability. 2022;14(3):1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
21. Hoidn S, Reusser K. Foundations of student-centered learning and teaching. En: The Routledge international handbook of student-centered learning and teaching in higher education. Routledge; 2020. p. 17–46. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-231957
22. Keiler LS. Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education. 2018;5(1):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6
23. Ryan MS, Holmboe ES, Chandra S. Competency-Based Medical Education: Considering Its Past, Present, and a Post–COVID-19 Era. Academic Medicine. 2022;97(3S):S90–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004535
24. Wentzell DD, Chung H, Hanson C, Gooi P. Competency-based medical education in ophthalmology residency training: a review. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2020;55(1):12–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2019.07.004
25. AHMADY S, KHAJEALI N, SHARIFI F, MIRMOGHTADAEI ZS. Factors related to academic failure in preclinical medical education: A systematic review. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2019;7(2). https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2019.44711
26. Sistermans IJ. Integrating competency-based education with a case-based or problem-based learning approach in online health sciences. Asia Pacific Education Review. 2020;21(4):683–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09658-6
27. Orr C, Sonnadara R. Coaching by design: exploring a new approach to faculty development in a competency-based medical education curriculum. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 2019;10:229–44. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S191470
28. McGrath JL, Taekman JM, Dev P, Danforth DR, Mohan D, Kman N, et al. Using Virtual Reality Simulation Environments to Assess Competence for Emergency Medicine Learners. Fernandez R, editor. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2018;25(2):186–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13308
29. Kaufman DM. Teaching and Learning in Medical Education: How Theory can Inform Practice. En: Understanding Medical Education. 1a ed. Wiley; 2018. p. 37–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119373780.ch4
30. Wu H, Li S, Zheng J, Guo J. Medical students’ motivation and academic performance: the mediating roles of self-efficacy and learning engagement. Medical Education Online. 2020;25(1):1742964. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1742964
31. Hayat AA, Shateri K, Amini M, Shokrpour N. Relationships between academic self-efficacy, learning-related emotions, and metacognitive learning strategies with academic performance in medical students: a structural equation model. BMC Medical Education. 2020;20(1):76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-01995-9
32. Hung CC, Kao HFS, Liu HC, Liang HF, Chu TP, Lee BO. Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing students’ perceived competence, self-efficacy, and learning satisfaction: A repeat measurement method. Nurse Education Today. 2021;97:104725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104725
33. Aguilera D, Perales-Palacios FJ. What Effects Do Didactic Interventions Have on Students’ Attitudes Towards Science? A Meta-Analysis. Research in Science Education. 2020;50(2):573–97. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9702-2
34. Klaassen RG. Interdisciplinary education: a case study. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2018;43(6):842–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1442417
35. Grospietsch F, Mayer J. Pre-service Science Teachers’ Neuroscience Literacy: Neuromyths and a Professional Understanding of Learning and Memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2019;13:20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00020
36. Cesari V, Galgani B, Gemignani A, Menicucci D. Enhancing Qualities of Consciousness during Online Learning via Multisensory Interactions. Behavioral Sciences. 2021;11(5):57. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11050057
37. So HY, Chen PP, Wong GKC, Chan TTN. Simulation in Medical Education. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. 2019;49(1):52–7. https://doi.org/10.4997/jrcpe.2019.112
38. Wu Q, Wang Y, Lu L, Chen Y, Long H, Wang J. Virtual Simulation in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review of Recent Practice. Frontiers in Medicine. 2022;9:855403. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.855403
39. McClelland M, Geldhof J, Morrison F, Gestsdóttir S, Cameron C, Bowers E, et al. Self-Regulation. En: Handbook of Life Course Health Development. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 275–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47143-3_12
40. James M, Baptista AMT, Barnabas D, Sadza A, Smith S, Usmani O, et al. Collaborative case-based learning with programmatic team-based assessment: a novel methodology for developing advanced skills in early-years medical students. BMC Medical Education. 2022;22(1):81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03111-5
41. Hopkins L, Hampton BS, Abbott JF, Buery-Joyner SD, Craig LB, Dalrymple JL, et al. To the point: medical education, technology, and the millennial learner. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018;218(2):188–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.001
42. Scherer R, Howard SK, Tondeur J, Siddiq F. Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching and learning in higher education: Who’s ready? Computers in Human Behavior. 2021;118:106675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106675
43. Tarmo A, Kimaro A. The teacher education curriculum and its competency‐based education attributes. The Journal of Competency-Based Education. 2021;6(3):e01255. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1255
44. Amhag L, Hellström L, Stigmar M. Teacher Educators’ Use of Digital Tools and Needs for Digital Competence in Higher Education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. 2019;35(4):203–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1646169
45. Oke A, Fernandes FAP. Innovations in Teaching and Learning: Exploring the Perceptions of the Education Sector on the 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2020;6(2):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6020031
46. Gómez-Galán J. Media Education in the ICT Era: Theoretical Structure for Innovative Teaching Styles. Information. 2020;11(5):276. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11050276
47. Lomis KD, Mejicano GC, Caverzagie KJ, Monrad SU, Pusic M, Hauer KE. The critical role of infrastructure and organizational culture in implementing competency-based education and individualized pathways in undergraduate medical education. Medical Teacher. 2021;43(sup2):S7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1924364
48. Espinoza D, Reed D. Wireless technologies and policies for connecting rural areas in emerging countries: a case study in rural Peru. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance. 2018;20(5):479–511. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-03-2018-0009
49. George R, Utunen H, Ndiaye N, Tokar A, Mattar L, Piroux C, et al. Ensuring equity in access to online courses: Perspectives from the WHO health emergency learning response. World Medical & Health Policy. 2022;14(2):413–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.492
50. Edwards-Schachter M. The nature and variety of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Studies. 2018;2(2):65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2018.08.004
51. Vitchenko A, Vitchenko A, Zamotaieva N, Khrystiuk S, Nikolayenko V. Designing integral learning outcomes in higher education within the frameworks of the competency-based approach. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice. 2022;22(6). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i6.5223
52. Sá MJ, Serpa S. Transversal Competences: Their Importance and Learning Processes by Higher Education Students. Education Sciences. 2018;8(3):126. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030126
53. Calero López I, Rodríguez-López B. The relevance of transversal competences in vocational education and training: a bibliometric analysis. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training. 2020;12(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-020-00100-0.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Elisabeth Viviana Lucero Baldevenites, Víctor Hugo González Torres, Yennifer Díaz-Romero , Mario Mitsuo Bueno-Fernández (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
