Assessing the Efficacy of Quality of Life Evaluations in the Management of Chronic Illnesses

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/hl2023203

Keywords:

Chronic Illness Management, Quality of Life Assessments, Patient-Reported Outcomes, Personalized Care Strategies, Healthcare Technology Integration, Longitudinal Monitoring

Abstract

Taking care of people with chronic illnesses usually needs a complex method that focuses on both improving their health and quality of life (QoL). This essay gives an in-depth look at how QoL ratings are used and how well they work in managing chronic diseases. We want to find out how to improve QoL ratings so that treatments work better and patients are happier by carefully looking at a number of different assessment tools, such as both subjective patient-reported results and objective measures. Quality of life (QoL) tests are important for learning about how chronic illnesses affect daily life, mental health, and social relationships. Our results show that patient-centered methods that take into account personal thoughts and feelings are very important for getting a true picture of how hard chronic diseases are. We also look at the link between better QoL and clinical interventions. Our findings show that customised treatment plans that include both medical and psychological parts of care are often linked to better QoL results. The paper also talks about the problems with the way QoL is currently measured, like how different measurement tools are used in different hospital situations and how there isn't any standardisation. The paper suggests a way to use technology, like electronic health records and mobile health apps, in regular quality of life tests. These tools can give us data in real time and help with long-term tracking.

References

1. AlOtaibi, S.S.; Almutairi, H.A.; Alotaibi, M.K.; Alharbi, K.; Bahari, G. Enhancing Nurses’ Disaster Management and Preparedness: Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Online Educational Program through a Quasi-Experimental Study. Risk Manag. Health Policy 2024, 17, 101–111.

2. Alshahrani, H.; Matrafi, N.; Qahtani, N.; Taliby, R.; Hassanein, M.; Rowilly, I. Mapping the Private Healthcare Sector in Riyadh Region: Size, Services, and Alignment with the Saudi Ministry of Health Priorities. Mater. Socio Medica 2023, 35, 172–177.

3. Al-Sheddi, A.; Kamel, S.; Almeshal, A.S.; Assiri, A.M.; Kamel, S., Jr. Distribution of Primary Healthcare Centers Between 2017 and 2021 Across Saudi Arabia. Cureus 2023, 15, e41932

4. Davis, S.L.; Johnson, A.H.; Lynch, T.; Gray, L.; Pryor, E.R.; Azuero, A.; Soistmann, H.C.; Phillips, S.R.; Rice, M. Inclusion of Effect Size Measures and Clinical Relevance in Research Papers. Nurs. Res. 2020, 70, 222–230.

5. Pullyblank, K.; Brunner, W.; Scribani, M.; Krupa, N.; Ory, M.G.; Smith, M.L. Recruitment and engagement in disease self-management programs: Special concerns for rural residents reporting depression and/or anxiety. Prev. Med. Rep. 2022, 26, 101761.

6. Leong, S.M.; Lei, W.I.; Chan, U.W. The Six-Month and One-Year Outcome of a Chronic Disease Self-Management Program among Older Adults in Macao: A Quasi-Experimental Study. SAGE Open Nurs. 2020, 6, 2377960820958231.

7. Bahari, G.; Kerari, A. Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Self-Management Program on Patients Living with Chronic Diseases. Risk Manag. Health Policy 2024, 17, 487–496.

8. Tanmaya Kumar Swain. (2015). Research & Development : Higher Education in India. International Journal on Research and Development - A Management Review, 4(2), 53 - 58.

9. Ch. Sudipta Kishore Nanda. (2015). Impact of Governance Facets and Indian Companies Performance: An Empirical Study. International Journal on Research and Development - A Management Review, 4(2), 59 - 72.

10. Hayden, J.A.; Ellis, J.; Ogilvie, R.; Stewart, S.A.; Bagg, M.K.; Stanojevic, S.; Yamato, T.P.; Saragiotto, B.T. Some types of exercise are more effective than others in people with chronic low back pain: A network meta-analysis. J. Physiother. 2021, 67, 252–262.

11. Kahere, M.; Ginindza, T. The prevalence and psychosocial risk factors of chronic low back pain in KwaZulunatal. Afr. J. Prim. Health Care Fam. Med. 2022, 14, a3134.

12. Járomi, M.; Szilágyi, B.; Velényi, A.; Leidecker, E.; Raposa, B.L.; Hock, M.; Baumann, P.; Ács, P.; Makai, A. Assessment of health-related quality of life and patient’s knowledge in chronic non-specific low back pain. BMC Public Health 2021, 21 (Suppl. 1), 1479.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Surath Panda S, Patil TA, H M, Bansal S, Lal Soni S. Assessing the Efficacy of Quality of Life Evaluations in the Management of Chronic Illnesses. Health Leadership and Quality of Life [Internet]. 2023 Dec. 30 [cited 2025 Aug. 30];2:203. Available from: https://hl.ageditor.ar/index.php/hl/article/view/203