Implementing Standardized Health Protocols for Enhanced Occupational Safety
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/hl2023196Keywords:
Occupational safety, Health protocols, Workplace safety, Employee well-being, Risk mitigation, Technology integrationAbstract
The workplaces are getting more complicated in many different fields, so standard health practices need to be put in place to make sure everyone is safer. For a long period, occupational health hazards including physical injury and mental anxiety have been a concern in workplace safety management. New technology and global health issues call for robust and consistent health practices that not only satisfy legal criteria but also enable employees to remain long-term healthy. Emphasising how they increase worker safety, this article examines how standardised health rules were developed and used. The first section of the research examines attentively present workplace health policies and identifies significant areas needing improvement. It emphasises the need of creating safety guidelines that everyone can follow while also allowing enough flexibility to fit various working environments. By following established policies, companies may reduce general numbers of work-related accidents and illness, cut risks, and increase worker production. One of the primary concepts of this work is using technology to monitor individuals and ensure they obey health regulations. The article demonstrates how extremely crucial data-driven approaches such as deploying smart tech and systems that monitor your health in real time can be for maintaining workers safe. The study also examines how training courses and education may ensure that employees are suited to appropriately grasp and apply the policies. Implementing these set guidelines is not always simple. Organisations could deal with issues like not wanting to change, ignorance of the situation, and inadequate resources. The report did state, however, that proactive, frequent reviews and revisions are necessary for long-term effectiveness from procedure standardisation. Standardised health practices taken as a whole may assist to ensure workplaces are safer, safeguard workers' health, and increase the entire success of a company.
References
[1] Robson, L.S.; Macdonald, S.; Gray, G.C.; Van Eerd, D.L.; Bigelow, P.L. A descriptive study of the OHS management auditing methods used by public sector organizations conducting audits of workplaces: Implications for audit reliability and validity. Saf. Sci. 2012, 50, 181–189.
[2] Sinelnikov, S.; Inouye, J.; Kerper, S. Using leading indicators to measure occupational health and safety performance. Saf. Sci. 2015, 72, 240–248.
[3] Høj, N.P.; Kröger, W. Risk analyses of transportation on road and railway from a European Perspective. Saf. Sci. 2002, 40, 337–357.
[4] Woodruff, J.M. Consequence and likelihood in risk estimation: A matter of balance in UK health and safety risk assessment practice. Saf. Sci. 2005, 43, 345–353.
[5] Reniers, G.L.L.; Dullaert, W.; Ale, B.J.M.; Soudan, K. Developing an external domino accident prevention framework: Hazwim. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2005, 18, 127–138.
[6] Marhavilas, P. Risk Assessment Techniques in the Worksites of Occupational Health-Safety Systems with Emphasis on Industries and Constructions. Ph.D. Thesis, Democritus University of Thrace, Xanthi, Greece, 2015.
[7] Sujit Kumar Acharya. (2015). Lessons in Management From Bhagavad Gita. International Journal on Research and Development - A Management Review, 4(2), 73 - 77.
[8] Neha Duggal. (2015). Mergers and acquisitions in India: A case Study on Indian Banking Sector. International Journal on Research and Development - A Management Review, 4(2), 78 - 83.
[9] Robson, L.S.; Clarke, J.A.; Cullen, K.; Bielecky, A.; Severin, C.; Bigelow, P.L.; Irvin, E.; Culyer, A.; Mahood, Q. The effectiveness of occupational health and safety management system interventions: A systematic review. Saf. Sci. 2007, 45, 329–353.
[10] da Silva, S.L.C.; Amaral, F.G. Critical factors of success and barriers to the implementation of occupational health and safety management systems: A systematic review of literature. Saf. Sci. 2019, 117, 123–132.
[11] Gallagher, C.; Underhill, E.; Rimmer, M. Occupational safety and health management systems in Australia: Barriers to success. Policy Pract. Health Saf. 2003, 1, 67–81.
[12] Saksvik, P.O.; Quinlan, M. Regulating systematic occupational health and safety management: Comparing the Norwegian and Australian experience. Ind. Relat. 2003, 58, 33–59.
[13] Walters, D. (Ed.) Regulating Health and Safety Management in the European Union: A Study of the Dynamics of Change; Presses Interuniversitaires Europeenes: Brussels, Belgium, 2002; ISBN 90-5201-998-3.
[14] Swuste, P.; van Gulijk, C.; Groeneweg, J.; Guldenmund, F.; Zwaard, W.; Lemkowitz, S. Occupational safety and safety management between 1988 and 2010: Review of safety literature in English and Dutch language scientific literature. Saf. Sci. 2020, 121, 303–318.
[15] Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Managing for Health and Safety; HSE: London, UK, 2013; pp. 1–66. ISBN 978-0-7176-6456-6.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Shailly Gupta, Suhas Ballal, Adarsh Kumar, Subhashree Ray, S.A. Jadhav (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
