The Influence of Environmental Health on the Formulation of Public Health Regulations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/hl2023194Keywords:
Environmental Health, Public Health Regulations, Air Quality, Water Contamination, Climate ChangeAbstract
When developing regulations that shield individuals from environmental hazards and enhance their general health, one should consider how public health legislation and environmental quality interact. Urbanisation, industry, and climate change have quickly transformed the earth; thus, the external factors affecting health have become clearer. Under the impact of natural health factors, the evolution of public health recommendations is investigated in this paper. It mostly covers air quality, water pollution, waste management, and chemical exposure harmful ones especially. These natural components are so complicated, therefore we have to use another approach to control public health and promote simultaneous economic growth. This paper addresses how knowledge of natural pollutants affects human health and how scientific results guide public health strategies. It addresses important regulations on the purity of air and water, waste disposal policies, and occupational health and safety standards as well as laws on Furthermore underlined are the challenges in putting these policies into effect: competing business interests, inadequate ways of verifying they are followed, and inadequate popular knowledge. It also addresses the role international organisations do in guiding environmental health policies and supporting nations in developing their own agendas. This emphasises the need of everyone cooperating to address worldwide environmental health issues. This study presents the advantages and drawbacks of present public health policies aimed to reduce environmental hazards by means of an examination of case studies from several spheres. It offers strategies to align environmental health research and policy development, enhance government collaboration, and increase participation in environmental health initiatives by means of alignment between governments. Strong environmental health data and comprehensive public health legislation are therefore concluded as necessary to get long-term public health outcomes in the face of environmental challenges.
References
1. Wang, Z.W. Chinese product surplus, overcapacity and economic structure adjustment. For. Econ. Chin. Res. Rep. 2011, 9, 351–357.
2. Subhrabaran, D.; Monalisa, D. Economic growth and environmental degradation: A cross country analysis. IASSIST Q. 2019, 38, 457–471.
3. Chen, C.Z. Enterprise transformation and economic development mode change. Chin. Circ. Econ. 2013, 3, 4–6.
4. Li, R.; Ramanathan, R. Exploring the relationships between different types of environmental regulations and environmental performance: Evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 196, 1329–1340.
5. Performance. International Journal on Research and Development - A Management Review, 4(3), 42 -46.
6. G Naveen Kumar, Venkata Sai Srinivasa Rao Muramalla, K Sudheer. (2015). Do Foreign Investors Comprehend the Opportunities of Indian Retailing?. International Journal on Research and Development - A Management Review, 4(3), 47 - 49.
7. Yang, Q.Y.; Song, D.Y. How does environmental regulation break the resource curse: Theoretical and empirical study on China. Resour. Policy 2019, 64, 101480.
8. Frenken, K.; Van Oort, F.; Verburg, T. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Reg. Stud. 2007, 41, 685–697.
9. Sato, M.; Dechezleprêtre, A. Asymmetric Industrial Energy Prices and International Trade. Energy Econ. 2015, 52, S130–S141.
10. Hille, E.; Möbius, P. Environmental Policy, Innovation, and Productivity Growth: Controlling the Effects of Regulation and Endogeneity. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2018, 10, 1315–1355.
11. Hille, E.; Möbius, P. Do Energy Prices Affect Employment? Decomposed International Evidence. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2019, 96, 1–26.
12. Earnhart, D.; Rassier, D.G. ‘Effective Regulatory Stringency’ and Firms’ Profitability: The Effects of Effluent Limits and Government Monitoring. J. Regul. Econ. 2016, 50, 111–145.
13. Kettner, C.; Köppl, A.; Schleicher, S.P.; Thenius, G. Stringency and Distribution in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme: First Evidence. Clim. Policy 2008, 8, 41–61.
14. Kaya, T.; Kahraman, C. Multicriteria decision making in Energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38, 6577–6585.
15. Mayuresh, P.; Santanu, B.; Dominic, C.Y.F. Energy sectorplanning using multipleindex pinch analysis. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2017, 19, 1967–1975.
16. Cheng, Y.; Sinha, A.; Ghosh, V.; Sengupta, T.; Luo, H.W. Carbon tax and energy innovation at crossroads of carbon neutrality: Designing a sustainable decarbonization policy. Environ. Manag. 2021, 294, 112957.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Suresh Kumar Behera, Jamuna K.V, Mahesh Sharma, Dhanaji Wagh, Shardha Purohit (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
